Suppr超能文献

体型较大的男性前列腺也较大:肥胖与前列腺癌风险的流行病学研究中的检测偏倚。

Larger men have larger prostates: Detection bias in epidemiologic studies of obesity and prostate cancer risk.

作者信息

Rundle Andrew, Wang Yun, Sadasivan Sudha, Chitale Dhananjay A, Gupta Nilesh S, Tang Deliang, Rybicki Benjamin A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

Prostate. 2017 Jun;77(9):949-954. doi: 10.1002/pros.23350. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with risk of aggressive prostate cancer (PCa), but not with over-all PCa risk. However, obese men have larger prostates which may lower biopsy accuracy and cause a systematic bias toward the null in epidemiologic studies of over-all risk.

METHODS

Within a cohort of 6692 men followed-up after a biopsy or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with benign findings, a nested case-control study was conducted of 495 prostate cancer cases and controls matched on age, race, follow-up duration, biopsy versus TURP, and procedure date. Data on body mass index and prostate volume at the time of the initial procedure were abstracted from medical records.

RESULTS

Prior to consideration of differences in prostate volume, overweight (OR = 1.41; 95%CI 1.01, 1.97), and obese status (OR = 1.59; 95%CI 1.09, 2.33) at the time of the original benign biopsy or TURP were associated with PCa incidence during follow-up. Prostate volume did not significantly moderate the association between body-size and PCa, however it did act as an inverse confounder; adjustment for prostate volume increased the effect size for overweight by 22% (adjusted OR = 1.52; 95%CI 1.08, 2.14) and for obese status by 23% (adjusted OR = 1.77; 95%CI 1.20, 2.62). Larger prostate volume at the time of the original benign biopsy or TURP was inversely associated with PCa incidence during follow-up (OR = 0.92 per 10 cc difference in volume; 95%CI 0.88, 0.97). In analyses that stratified case-control pairs by tumor aggressiveness of the case, prostate volume acted as an inverse confounder in analyses of non-aggressive PCa but not in analyses of aggressive PCa.

CONCLUSIONS

In studies of obesity and PCa, differences in prostate volume cause a bias toward the null, particularly in analyses of non-aggressive PCa. A pervasive underestimation of the association between obesity and overall PCa risk may exist in the literature.

摘要

背景

肥胖与侵袭性前列腺癌(PCa)风险相关,但与总体PCa风险无关。然而,肥胖男性的前列腺较大,这可能会降低活检准确性,并在总体风险的流行病学研究中导致向无效值的系统偏差。

方法

在一组6692名男性中,这些男性在前列腺活检或经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后进行随访,结果为良性,进行了一项巢式病例对照研究,纳入495例前列腺癌病例和对照组,对照组在年龄、种族、随访时间、活检与TURP以及手术日期方面进行匹配。从医疗记录中提取初次手术时的体重指数和前列腺体积数据。

结果

在考虑前列腺体积差异之前,初次良性活检或TURP时超重(OR = 1.41;95%CI 1.01,1.97)和肥胖状态(OR = 1.59;95%CI 1.09,2.33)与随访期间的PCa发病率相关。前列腺体积并未显著调节体型与PCa之间的关联,然而它确实起到了反向混杂因素的作用;对前列腺体积进行调整后,超重的效应大小增加了22%(调整后OR = 1.52;95%CI 1.08,2.14),肥胖状态的效应大小增加了23%(调整后OR = 1.77;95%CI 1.20,2.62)。初次良性活检或TURP时较大的前列腺体积与随访期间的PCa发病率呈负相关(每10 cc体积差异的OR = 0.92;95%CI 0.88,0.97)。在按病例的肿瘤侵袭性对病例对照对进行分层的分析中,前列腺体积在非侵袭性PCa分析中起到反向混杂因素的作用,但在侵袭性PCa分析中并非如此。

结论

在肥胖与PCa的研究中,前列腺体积的差异导致向无效值的偏差,特别是在非侵袭性PCa的分析中。文献中可能普遍低估了肥胖与总体PCa风险之间的关联。

相似文献

6
Obesity and prostate cancer: epidemiology and clinical implications.肥胖与前列腺癌:流行病学及临床意义
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):331-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.069. Epub 2007 May 2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验