Yang Qi, Zou Xiong, You Rui, Liu You-Ping, Han Yuan, Zhang Yi-Nuan, Guo Ling, Mai Hai-Qiang, Xie Chuan-Miao, Li Li, Hong Ming-Huang, Chen Ming-Yuan
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Oral Oncol. 2017 Apr;67:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
To analyze the clinical outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis (PRNN) and construct a new risk classification system for predicting survival of PRNN.
A total of 276 patients with PRNN were consecutively enrolled. Complete magnetic resonance (MR) images of the nasopharynx and neck were available for all patients and were used to assess nasopharyngeal necrosis status. After 2010, patients with PRNN were initially treated by radical endoscopic necrectomy followed by reconstruction with nasal flap (ENNF).
The 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 65.0% and 51.6%, respectively. Three variables affected survival: osteoradionecrosis, re-irradiation, and internal carotid artery (ICA) exposure, and only two variables were found to be independent prognostic factors: re-irradiation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, P=0.001) and internal carotid artery (ICA) exposure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.80, P=0.001). These two variables were combined to create a new risk classification system for PRNN. 131 (47.5%), 110 (39.9%), and 35 (12.7%) patients were classified into low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, with the 2-year OS rates of 64.8%, 45.1%, and 22.5%, respectively (P<0.001). ENNF was associated with a better OS in these three group patients compared with conservative management with statistical or marginal statistical significance (2-year OS low-risk group, 90.9% vs 61.1%, p=0.081; intermediate-risk group: 100% vs 37.8%, P=0.001; and high-risk group, 57.1% vs 20.8%, p=0.066).
The new risk classification system provides accurate estimates of prognosis. ENNF surgery may lead to better survival outcome than conservative management in PRNN patients.
分析鼻咽癌(NPC)放疗后鼻咽坏死(PRNN)患者的临床结局,并构建一种新的风险分类系统以预测PRNN患者的生存情况。
连续纳入276例PRNN患者。所有患者均有完整的鼻咽部和颈部磁共振(MR)图像,用于评估鼻咽坏死情况。2010年后,PRNN患者最初接受根治性内镜坏死切除术,随后采用鼻瓣重建术(ENNF)。
1年和2年总生存率(OS)分别为65.0%和51.6%。有三个变量影响生存:放射性骨坏死、再次放疗和颈内动脉(ICA)暴露,且仅发现两个变量为独立预后因素:再次放疗(风险比[HR] 1.75,P = 0.001)和颈内动脉(ICA)暴露(风险比[HR] 1.80,P = 0.001)。将这两个变量结合起来创建了一种新的PRNN风险分类系统。131例(47.5%)、110例(39.9%)和35例(12.7%)患者分别被分为低、中、高风险组,2年OS率分别为64.8%、45.1%和22.5%(P < 0.001)。与保守治疗相比,ENNF在这三组患者中与更好的OS相关,具有统计学或边缘统计学意义(2年OS低风险组,90.9%对61.1%,p = 0.081;中风险组:100%对37.8%,P = 0.001;高风险组,57.1%对20.8%,p = 0.066)。
新的风险分类系统能准确预估预后。在PRNN患者中,ENNF手术可能比保守治疗带来更好的生存结局。