Suppr超能文献

神经精神障碍人群的社会认知:精神分裂症和内侧颞叶癫痫的心理理论比较。

Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: a comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

机构信息

Clinical Neuroscience Lab, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland.

Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 28;7(1):484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00565-2.

Abstract

Social cognition deficits are observed both in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). This may be due to dysfunction of the amygdala network, which is a common feature of both diseases. In this study, SCZ (n = 48) or MTLE (n = 31) and healthy controls (HC, n = 47) completed assessments of mentalising (Reading Mind in the Eyes Test, RMET) and basic cognitive processing, e.g., working memory, executive functions and psychomotor speed (Trail-Making Test B and Digit Symbol). SCZ were also assessed with the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We found that the RMET scores of the two clinical groups were similar (p > 0.05) and lower than in the HCs (SCZ: p < 0.05; MTLE: p < 0.001). In the next step, SCZ were split into two groups with respect to the level of symptoms. Analysis of the RMET scores revealed no differences between the HC (M = 25.7 ± 4.1) and POS-LO (M = 25.3 ± 4.8); both groups outperformed the POS-HI group (M = 21.3 ± 5.2) and the MTLE group (M = 20.8 ± 4.6). No differences were found for the median-split with regard to negative symptoms. In SCZ, the mind-reading deficit appears to be associated with the level of positive symptoms. Both POS-HI and MTLE patients present significant mentalising deficits compared to healthy controls.

摘要

社会认知缺陷在精神分裂症(SCZ)患者和内侧颞叶癫痫(MTLE)患者中均有观察到。这可能是由于杏仁核网络功能障碍所致,这是两种疾病的共同特征。在这项研究中,SCZ(n = 48)或 MTLE(n = 31)和健康对照组(HC,n = 47)完成了心理化评估(读心测试,RMET)和基本认知处理,例如工作记忆、执行功能和运动速度(TMT-B 和数字符号)。SCZ 还接受了阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)的评估。我们发现,两个临床组的 RMET 分数相似(p > 0.05),且低于 HC(SCZ:p < 0.05;MTLE:p < 0.001)。在下一步中,根据症状水平将 SCZ 分为两组。RMET 评分分析显示,HC(M = 25.7 ± 4.1)和 POS-LO 组(M = 25.3 ± 4.8)之间没有差异;两组均优于 POS-HI 组(M = 21.3 ± 5.2)和 MTLE 组(M = 20.8 ± 4.6)。对于中位数的分割,阴性症状没有差异。在 SCZ 中,读心缺陷似乎与阳性症状的水平有关。POS-HI 和 MTLE 患者与健康对照组相比,均存在明显的心理化缺陷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e5/5428695/d0b168cdfa60/41598_2017_565_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验