Stange Rainer, Schneider Berthold, Albrecht Uwe, Mueller Valentina, Schnitker Joerg, Michalsen Andreas
Internal and Complementary Medicine, Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin-Wannsee, Berlin.
Institute for Biostatistics, Medical University.
Res Rep Urol. 2017 Mar 14;9:43-50. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S121203. eCollection 2017.
To demonstrate non-inferiority of an herbal combination (horseradish root and nasturtium herb) to an antibiotic (co-trimoxazole) in acute uncomplicated cystitis.
Randomized, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, phase III clinical study, using block randomization of 4 blocks (size 2).
Twenty-six centers in Germany, from May 2011 to June 2013.
Adult patients (median age, 38.5 years; 90% female) with acute uncomplicated cystitis confirmed via urinalysis and bacterial counts.
Patients received the herbal combination (five tablets, four times per day) or the antibiotic (two tablets daily) for a period of 7 or 3 days, respectively, followed by a 21-days without drug treatment. Placebos ensured blinding.
The primary endpoint was the percentage of responders, expressed as reduction of germ count from >10 to <10 CFU/mL of pathogens between visit 1 (day 0) and 3 (day 15). Secondary endpoints included change of symptom scores, duration of symptoms, efficacy assessments, relapse frequency, and safety. A sample size of 178 patients per group was estimated.
Of the 96 randomized patients (intent-to-treat; 45 in the phytotherapy group, 51 in the antibiotic group), 51 were considered per-protocol patients (22 in the phytotherapy group, 29 in the antibiotic group). Responder rates were 10/22 (45.5%) for the phytotherapy group and 15/29 (51.1%) for the antibiotic group (group difference: -6.27% [95% CI: -33.90%-21.3%]). The study was terminated prematurely due to slow recruitment rates. Non-inferiority could not be assumed by predefined criteria. During the follow-up period, one relapse occurred in each group. Both treatments were well tolerated.
This clinical trial indicates comparable efficacy of the herbal combination and antibiotic, although non-inferiority was not proved. However, the results and lessons learned are important for the planning of future trials. Issues that led to the premature trial discontinuation were considered.
在急性单纯性膀胱炎中,证明一种草药组合(辣根和旱金莲)相对于一种抗生素(复方新诺明)的非劣效性。
随机、前瞻性、双盲、双模拟、多中心III期临床研究,采用4个区组(每组2例)的区组随机化。
2011年5月至2013年6月期间德国的26个中心。
经尿液分析和细菌计数确诊的急性单纯性膀胱炎成年患者(中位年龄38.5岁;90%为女性)。
患者分别接受草药组合(每日4次,每次5片)或抗生素(每日2片)治疗7天或3天,随后21天不进行药物治疗。安慰剂确保了盲法。
主要终点是反应者的百分比,以第1次就诊(第0天)和第3次就诊(第15天)之间病原体的菌落计数从>10降至<10 CFU/mL表示。次要终点包括症状评分的变化、症状持续时间、疗效评估、复发频率和安全性。估计每组样本量为178例患者。
在96例随机分组的患者中(意向性分析;植物疗法组45例,抗生素组51例),51例被视为符合方案患者(植物疗法组22例,抗生素组29例)。植物疗法组的反应率为10/22(45.5%),抗生素组为15/29(51.1%)(组间差异:-6.27%[95%CI:-33.90%-21.3%])。由于招募率低,该研究提前终止。根据预定义标准不能假定非劣效性。在随访期间,每组各发生1例复发。两种治疗耐受性均良好。
本临床试验表明草药组合和抗生素疗效相当,尽管未证明非劣效性。然而,结果和经验教训对未来试验的规划很重要。考虑了导致试验提前终止的问题。