• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in Non-BRCA-Mutated patients.非BRCA基因突变患者的对侧预防性乳房切除术
Open Med (Wars). 2016 Aug 2;11(1):238-241. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0047. eCollection 2016.
2
Improved overall survival after contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with a history of unilateral breast cancer: a prospective analysis.BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者且有单侧乳腺癌病史者行对侧预防性乳房切除术后总生存率的改善:一项前瞻性分析。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;136(3):668-77. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29032. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
3
Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and other high-risk women in the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab).BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变携带者及其他高危女性的对侧预防性乳房切除术——凯思琳·坎宁安家族乳腺癌研究联合会(kConFab)的研究
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Apr;120(3):715-23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0497-8. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
4
Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in young breast cancer patients with and without genetic cancer risk assessment.有或无遗传性癌症风险评估的年轻乳腺癌患者的对侧预防性乳房切除术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Dec;15(12):3415-21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0160-3. Epub 2008 Oct 4.
5
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: what surgeons need to know.BRCA 突变携带者的双侧预防性乳房切除术:外科医生需要了解的内容。
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:1-2.
6
Feasibility study of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy with breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations in Japan.日本 BRCA 基因突变乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术联合乳房重建的可行性研究。
Breast Cancer. 2018 Sep;25(5):539-546. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0850-z. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
7
Timely cancer genetic counseling and testing for young women with breast cancer: impact on surgical decision-making for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy.及时为年轻乳腺癌女性提供癌症遗传咨询和检测:对降低对侧风险的预防性乳房切除术手术决策的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(2):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06619-y. Epub 2022 May 21.
8
The Angelina Jolie effect: Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy trends in patients at increased risk of breast cancer.安吉丽娜·朱莉效应:高乳腺癌风险患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术的趋势。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 2;11(1):2847. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82654-x.
9
Contralateral mastectomy improves survival in women with BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer.BRCA1/2 相关乳腺癌患者行对侧乳房切除术可改善生存。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jul;140(1):135-42. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2583-1. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
10
The psychosocial impact of contralateral risk reducing mastectomy (CRRM) on women: A rapid review.对接受对侧预防性降低风险乳房切除术(CRRM)的女性的心理社会影响的快速综述。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):43-52. doi: 10.1002/pon.4448. Epub 2017 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Controlateral Symmetrisation in SRM for Breast Cancer: Now or Then? Immediate versus Delayed Symmetrisation in a Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction.乳腺癌乳房重建中对侧对称化:现在还是以后?两阶段乳房重建中即刻与延迟对称化的比较。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 30;29(12):9391-9400. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120737.
2
Genetic Testing and Professional Responsibility: The Italian Experience.基因检测与职业责任:意大利的经验
Open Med (Wars). 2018 Aug 24;13:298-300. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0046. eCollection 2018.
3
Genetic Risk in Insurance Field.保险领域中的遗传风险。
Open Med (Wars). 2018 Aug 24;13:294-297. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0045. eCollection 2018.
4
Genetic Testing: Ethical Aspects.基因检测:伦理方面。
Open Med (Wars). 2018 Jul 2;13:247-252. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0038. eCollection 2018.
5
RNA-Sequence Analysis Reveals Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) in Patients Exhibiting Different Risks of Tumor Metastasis.RNA序列分析揭示了具有不同肿瘤转移风险的患者中差异表达基因(DEGs)。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jun 11;23:2842-2849. doi: 10.12659/msm.904789.
6
Excellence and safety in surgery require excellent and safe tutoring.手术的卓越与安全需要出色且安全的指导。
Open Med (Wars). 2016 Dec 25;11(1):518-522. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0089. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate stable at major Canadian breast cancer center.加拿大主要乳腺癌中心的对侧预防性乳房切除术率保持稳定。
World J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 10;7(3):302-7. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i3.302.
2
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM): A systematic review of patient reported factors and psychological predictors influencing choice and satisfaction.对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM):对患者报告的影响选择和满意度的因素及心理预测指标的系统评价
Breast. 2016 Aug;28:107-20. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
3
Genome-wide association analysis of more than 120,000 individuals identifies 15 new susceptibility loci for breast cancer.对超过12万名个体进行的全基因组关联分析确定了15个新的乳腺癌易感基因座。
Nat Genet. 2015 Apr;47(4):373-80. doi: 10.1038/ng.3242. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
Trends in the use of bilateral mastectomy in England from 2002 to 2011: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics.2002 年至 2011 年英格兰双侧乳房切除术使用趋势:医院住院统计回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 1;3(8):e003179. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003179.
5
Operative risks associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a single institution experience.与对侧预防性乳房切除术相关的手术风险:单机构经验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4113-20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3108-1. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
6
Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk.大规模基因分型鉴定出 41 个与乳腺癌风险相关的新位点。
Nat Genet. 2013 Apr;45(4):353-61, 361e1-2. doi: 10.1038/ng.2563.
7
Increasing mastectomy rates among all age groups for early stage breast cancer: a 10-year study of surgical choice.所有年龄段早期乳腺癌乳房切除术率的增加:10 年手术选择研究。
Breast J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):318-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01245.x. Epub 2012 May 21.
8
Comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and unilateral total mastectomy in breast cancer patients.对比乳腺癌患者接受对侧预防性乳房切除术与单侧全乳房切除术的患者特征和结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug;19(8):2600-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2299-1. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
9
Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.临床管理因素影响对侧预防性乳房切除术的决策。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2158-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.4041. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
10
Mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates: an institutional review.乳房切除术和对侧预防性乳房切除术的比率:机构审查。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 May;18(5):1356-63. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1434-0. Epub 2010 Dec 2.

非BRCA基因突变患者的对侧预防性乳房切除术

Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in Non-BRCA-Mutated patients.

作者信息

Falco Giuseppe, Rocco Nicola, Bordoni Daniele, Marano Luigi, Accurso Antonello, Buccelli Claudio, Di Lorenzo Pierpaolo, Capasso Emanuele, Policino Fabio, Niola Massimo, Ferrari Guglielmo

机构信息

Breast Surgery Unit Arcispedale-IRCCS Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Napoli, Italy.

出版信息

Open Med (Wars). 2016 Aug 2;11(1):238-241. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0047. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1515/med-2016-0047
PMID:28352801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5329834/
Abstract

The use of contralateral risk reducing mastectomy (CRRM) is indicated in women affected by breast cancer, who are at high risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer, particularly women with genetic mutation of BRCA1, BRCA2 and P53. However we should consider that the genes described above account for only 20-30% of the excess familiar risk. What is contralaterally indicated when genetic assessment results negative for mutation in a young patient with unilateral breast cancer? Is it ethically correct to remove a contralateral "healthy" breast? CRRM rates continue to rise all over the world although CRRM seems not to improve overall survival in women with unilateral sporadic breast cancer. The decision to pursue CRRM as part of treatment in women who have a low-to-moderate risk of developing a secondary cancer in the contralateral breast should consider both breast cancer individual-features and patients preferences, but should be not supported by the surgeon and avoided as first approach with the exception of women highly worried about cancer. Prospective studies are needed to identify cohorts of patients most likely to benefit from CRRM.

摘要

对于罹患乳腺癌且对侧乳腺癌发病风险较高的女性,尤其是携带BRCA1、BRCA2和P53基因突变的女性,建议进行对侧预防性乳房切除术(CRRM)。然而,我们应该认识到,上述基因仅占家族性额外风险的20%-30%。对于单侧乳腺癌的年轻患者,若基因评估结果显示无突变,那么对侧应如何处理?切除对侧“健康”乳房在伦理上是否正确?尽管CRRM似乎并不能提高单侧散发性乳腺癌女性的总体生存率,但全球范围内CRRM的比例仍在持续上升。对于对侧乳房发生继发性癌症风险较低至中等的女性,将CRRM作为治疗方案的一部分时,应综合考虑乳腺癌的个体特征和患者偏好,但外科医生不应支持该方案,除非女性对癌症极度担忧,否则应避免将其作为首选方法。需要开展前瞻性研究,以确定最有可能从CRRM中获益的患者群体。