• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化胰岛素治疗预防创伤性脑损伤患者术后感染:一项随机对照试验。

Intensive insulin therapy for preventing postoperative infection in patients with traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Wang Yan, Li Jin-Ping, Song Ying-Lun, Zhao Qi-Huang

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery (Intensive Care Unit) Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(13):e6458. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006458.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000006458
PMID:28353579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5380263/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) for preventing postoperative infection in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

In total, 88 patients with TBI were randomly divided into 2 groups, 44 in each group. One group (group ITT) received IIT and the other group (group CIT) received conventional insulin therapy (CIT). This study was conducted between February 2013 and January 2016. Outcomes included infection rate, mortality, and neurological outcome (measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]).

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients completed the study. IIT showed greater efficacy than CIT, with a decreased infection rate in the IIT group compared to the CIT group (31.9% vs 52.3%, P = 0.03), and also a reduced duration of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) (IIT group, 4.5 ± 2.1 days vs CIT group, 5.7 ± 2.8 days, P = 0.02). In addition, a significant difference in scores on the GOS scale was observed between the 2 groups (P = 0.04). The mortality rates in hospital and at the 26-week follow-up were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

IIT leads to a reduced infection rate, shorter stays in ICU, and improved neurological outcome.

摘要

目的

评估强化胰岛素治疗(IIT)对预防创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者术后感染的效果。

方法

总共88例TBI患者被随机分为2组,每组44例。一组(ITT组)接受IIT,另一组(CIT组)接受常规胰岛素治疗(CIT)。本研究于2013年2月至2016年1月进行。观察指标包括感染率、死亡率和神经功能转归(采用格拉斯哥预后量表[GOS]进行评估)。

结果

共有81例患者完成研究。IIT显示出比CIT更好的疗效,IIT组的感染率低于CIT组(31.9%对52.3%,P = 0.03),且重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间也缩短(IIT组,4.5±2.1天对CIT组,5.7±2.8天,P = 0.02)。此外,两组在GOS量表评分上存在显著差异(P = 0.04)。两组的院内死亡率和26周随访时的死亡率相似。

结论

IIT可降低感染率,缩短ICU住院时间,并改善神经功能转归。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/5380263/bb75268dd3a3/medi-96-e6458-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/5380263/bb75268dd3a3/medi-96-e6458-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/5380263/bb75268dd3a3/medi-96-e6458-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Intensive insulin therapy for preventing postoperative infection in patients with traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled trial.强化胰岛素治疗预防创伤性脑损伤患者术后感染:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(13):e6458. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006458.
2
Intensive insulin therapy after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial.重度创伤性脑损伤后的强化胰岛素治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Neurocrit Care. 2008;9(2):159-66. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9084-9.
3
[The influence of intensive insulin therapy on the mortality of critically ill patients in intensive care unit: a meta-analysis].[强化胰岛素治疗对重症监护病房危重症患者死亡率的影响:一项荟萃分析]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2009 Jun;21(6):349-52.
4
Intensive insulin therapy on infection rate, days in NICU, in-hospital mortality and neurological outcome in severe traumatic brain injury patients: a randomized controlled trial.强化胰岛素治疗对重度创伤性脑损伤患者感染率、新生儿重症监护病房住院天数、院内死亡率及神经学转归的影响:一项随机对照试验
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jun;46(6):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
5
Comparison of intensive versus conventional insulin therapy in traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.创伤性脑损伤中强化胰岛素治疗与传统胰岛素治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Brain Inj. 2018;32(6):693-703. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1457181. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
6
Intensive intraoperative insulin therapy versus conventional insulin therapy during cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.心脏手术期间强化术中胰岛素治疗与常规胰岛素治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):829-34. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
7
Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.强化胰岛素治疗与常规胰岛素治疗对行胃癌 D2 胃大部切除术的 2 型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
World J Surg. 2011 Jan;35(1):85-92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0797-5.
8
Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy.预防危重病性多发性神经病和危重病性肌病的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 30;2014(1):CD006832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006832.pub3.
9
Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy in critically ill neurologic patients.重症神经疾病患者强化与常规胰岛素治疗比较。
Neurocrit Care. 2010 Dec;13(3):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9417-3.
10
Intensive insulin therapy in severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial.重度创伤性脑损伤的强化胰岛素治疗:一项随机试验。
J Trauma. 2010 Apr;68(4):904-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c9afc2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.《2024年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》
J Intensive Care. 2025 Mar 14;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00776-0.
2
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.《2024年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》
Acute Med Surg. 2025 Feb 24;12(1):e70037. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70037. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Perioperative glycaemic control for people with diabetes undergoing surgery.手术治疗糖尿病患者的围手术期血糖控制

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of traumatic brain injury in Lebanon: A systematic review.黎巴嫩创伤性脑损伤的流行病学与临床特征:一项系统综述
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(47):e5342. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005342.
2
Injury of the dorsolateral prefronto-thalamic tract in a patient with depression following mild traumatic brain injury: A case report.轻度创伤性脑损伤后抑郁症患者的背外侧前额叶 - 丘脑束损伤:一例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(39):e5009. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005009.
3
Relation between injury of the periaqueductal gray and central pain in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: Observational study.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007315.pub3.
4
Glycaemic control for patients with severe acute brain injury: Protocol for a systematic review.严重急性脑损伤患者的血糖控制:系统评价方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Feb;67(2):240-247. doi: 10.1111/aas.14166. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
A Retrospective Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury: Evaluation of CONSORT Item Adherence.创伤性脑损伤随机对照试验的回顾性分析:CONSORT 条目依从性评估
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 13;11(11):1504. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111504.
6
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).《2020年日本脓毒症及脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》(J-SSCG 2020)
Acute Med Surg. 2021 Aug 26;8(1):e659. doi: 10.1002/ams2.659. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).《2020年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》(J-SSCG 2020)
J Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 25;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7.
8
Lack of recognition and documentation of stress hyperglycemia is a disruptor of optimal continuity of care.未能识别和记录应激性高血糖会破坏最佳连续性护理。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 1;11(1):11476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89945-3.
9
Is intensive glucose control bad for critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.强化血糖控制对危重症患者有害吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 12;16(9):1658-1675. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.43447. eCollection 2020.
10
Electrical stimulation for limb spasticity in children with traumatic brain injury: Study protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trial.创伤性脑损伤患儿肢体痉挛的电刺激治疗:一项随机对照试验系统评价的研究方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e14515. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014515.
轻度创伤性脑损伤患者中脑导水管周围灰质损伤与中枢性疼痛的关系:观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(26):e4017. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004017.
4
Impact of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring on Prognosis of Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颅内压监测对重型颅脑损伤患者预后的影响:一项PRISMA系统评价与Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(7):e2827. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002827.
5
Development of a Screening Tool for Predicting Adverse Outcomes of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.用于预测妊娠期糖尿病不良结局的筛查工具的开发:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(1):e2204. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002204.
6
Intensive insulin therapy in severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial.重度创伤性脑损伤的强化胰岛素治疗:一项随机试验。
J Trauma. 2010 Apr;68(4):904-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c9afc2.
7
Intensive insulin therapy on infection rate, days in NICU, in-hospital mortality and neurological outcome in severe traumatic brain injury patients: a randomized controlled trial.强化胰岛素治疗对重度创伤性脑损伤患者感染率、新生儿重症监护病房住院天数、院内死亡率及神经学转归的影响:一项随机对照试验
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jun;46(6):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
8
Intensive insulin therapy after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized clinical trial.重度创伤性脑损伤后的强化胰岛素治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Neurocrit Care. 2008;9(2):159-66. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9084-9.
9
The effect of intensive insulin therapy on infection rate, vasospasm, neurologic outcome, and mortality in neurointensive care unit after intracranial aneurysm clipping in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized prospective pilot trial.强化胰岛素治疗对急性蛛网膜下腔出血患者颅内动脉瘤夹闭术后神经重症监护病房感染率、血管痉挛、神经功能转归及死亡率的影响:一项随机前瞻性试点试验。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2007 Jul;19(3):156-60. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3180338e69.
10
Intensive intraoperative insulin therapy versus conventional glucose management during cardiac surgery: a randomized trial.心脏手术期间强化术中胰岛素治疗与传统血糖管理的随机试验
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):233-43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00002.