Chae Sophia, Desai Sheila, Crowell Marjorie, Sedgh Gilda, Singh Susheela
Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 29;12(3):e0172976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172976. eCollection 2017.
In 2010-2014, approximately 86% of abortions took place in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although abortion incidence varies minimally across geographical regions, it varies widely by subregion and within countries by subgroups of women. Differential abortion levels stem from variation in the level of unintended pregnancies and in the likelihood that women with unintended pregnancies obtain abortions.
To examine the characteristics of women obtaining induced abortions in LMICs.
We use data from official statistics, population-based surveys, and abortion patient surveys to examine variation in the percentage distribution of abortions and abortion rates by age at abortion, marital status, parity, wealth, education, and residence. We analyze data from five countries in Africa, 13 in Asia, eight in Europe, and two in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC).
Women across all sociodemographic subgroups obtain abortions. In most countries, women aged 20-29 obtained the highest proportion of abortions, and while adolescents obtained a substantial fraction of abortions, they do not make up a disproportionate share. Region-specific patterns were observed in the distribution of abortions by parity. In many countries, a higher fraction of abortions occurred among women of high socioeconomic status, as measured by wealth status, educational attainment, and urban residence. Due to limited data on marital status, it is unknown whether married or unmarried women make up a larger share of abortions.
These findings help to identify subgroups of women with disproportionate levels of abortion, and can inform policies and programs to reduce the incidence of unintended pregnancies; and in LMICs that have restrictive abortion laws, these findings can also inform policies to minimize the consequences of unsafe abortion and motivate liberalization of abortion laws. Program planners, policymakers, and advocates can use this information to improve access to safe abortion services, postabortion care, and contraceptive services.
2010 - 2014年期间,约86%的堕胎发生在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。尽管堕胎发生率在不同地理区域差异极小,但在次区域之间以及国家内部不同女性亚群体之间差异很大。堕胎水平的差异源于意外怀孕水平的差异以及意外怀孕女性获得堕胎的可能性差异。
研究低收入和中等收入国家接受人工流产女性的特征。
我们使用官方统计数据、基于人群的调查数据以及堕胎患者调查数据,来研究按堕胎年龄、婚姻状况、生育状况、财富、教育程度和居住地划分的堕胎百分比分布和堕胎率的差异。我们分析了来自非洲5个国家、亚洲13个国家、欧洲8个国家以及拉丁美洲和加勒比地区(LAC)2个国家的数据。
所有社会人口统计学亚群体的女性都会堕胎。在大多数国家,20 - 29岁的女性堕胎比例最高,虽然青少年堕胎占了相当大的比例,但她们所占份额并非不成比例。在按生育状况划分的堕胎分布中观察到了特定区域模式。在许多国家,按财富状况、教育程度和城市居住情况衡量,社会经济地位较高的女性堕胎比例更高。由于婚姻状况数据有限,尚不清楚已婚或未婚女性在堕胎中所占份额更大。
这些发现有助于识别堕胎水平不成比例的女性亚群体,并可为减少意外怀孕发生率的政策和项目提供参考;在堕胎法律严格的低收入和中等收入国家,这些发现还可为尽量减少不安全堕胎后果并推动堕胎法律自由化的政策提供参考。项目规划者、政策制定者和倡导者可以利用这些信息来改善安全堕胎服务、堕胎后护理和避孕服务的可及性。