Yang Shang-Yu, Lin Chung-Ying, Lee Ya-Chen, Chang Jer-Hao
Department of Occupational Therapy, Shu Zen Junior College of Medicine and Management, Taiwan; Institute of Allied Health Science, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University: No.1 University Road, Tainan City 701, Taiwan.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Mar;29(3):548-555. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.548. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
[Purpose] This study investigated whether the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure is a suitable outcome measure for assessing patients with stroke in research and clinical settings. [Subjects and Methods] The study included into two parts: (1) an investigation of the reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for patients with stroke and (2) an exploration of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure results in randomized controlled trials of patients with stroke. For this review, the study searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, and CINAHL Plus with Full Text databases for articles published before September 2015. [Results] Finally, three eligible articles were collected in part 1, and ten randomized controlled trials studies were collected in part 2. The findings of part 1 revealed that the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure had efficient test-retest reliability, however, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure revealed weak associations with other assessment tools such as Barthel Index used for patients with stroke. Six of the randomized controlled trials studies used the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as a primary outcome and two as a secondary outcome, while the other two as a goal-setting instrument. [Conclusion] This review indicates that the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure is appropriate for clinicians, including physiotherapists, in assessing outcome for patients with stroke. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure can assist patients in identifying their outcome performance and provide therapists with directions on interventions.
[目的] 本研究调查了《加拿大职业表现测量量表》是否适合作为研究和临床环境中评估中风患者的结局指标。[对象与方法] 该研究分为两个部分:(1) 对中风患者使用《加拿大职业表现测量量表》的信度和效度进行调查,以及 (2) 对中风患者随机对照试验中《加拿大职业表现测量量表》的结果进行探索。对于本综述,研究检索了MEDLINE、PubMed和CINAHL Plus全文数据库中2015年9月之前发表的文章。[结果] 最终,在第1部分收集到3篇符合条件的文章,在第2部分收集到10项随机对照试验研究。第1部分的研究结果表明,《加拿大职业表现测量量表》具有良好的重测信度,然而,该量表与用于中风患者的其他评估工具(如巴氏指数)的关联性较弱。10项随机对照试验研究中,6项将《加拿大职业表现测量量表》作为主要结局指标,2项作为次要结局指标,另外2项将其作为目标设定工具。[结论] 本综述表明,《加拿大职业表现测量量表》适用于包括物理治疗师在内的临床医生评估中风患者的结局。该量表可以帮助患者确定其结局表现,并为治疗师提供干预方向。