Mishra Niranjan, Birmiwal Krishna Gopal, Pani Nibedita, Raut Subhrajit, Sharma Gaurav, Rath Krushna Chandra
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul-Dec;7(2):178-185. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_78_16.
Sedation is an important component of day care oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures under local anesthesia. Although various sedative drugs in different regimens have been used for sedation, an ideal agent and regimen are yet to be established.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine and midazolam as a sedative agent for day care oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures.
The study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
A total of sixty adult patients of age group 18-65 years, of either sex were randomly selected equally in two groups for the study. One group named Group D received dexmedetomidine and the other named Group M received midazolam. Patients were evaluated for oxygen saturation (SPO), respiration rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), Ramsay sedation score, bispectral index (BIS) score, amnesia, Aldrete score, relaxation during the surgery, and drug preference.
Midazolam was associated with greater amnesia. Dexmedetomidine was associated with lower heart rate, SBP, and DBP. There was no significant difference in SPO, RR, Aldrete score, Ramsay sedation score, and BIS score between the two drugs. Patient preference and relaxation were more in dexmedetomidine group.
IV dexmedetomidine is a comparable alternative to midazolam for sedation in day care oral and maxillofacial surgery under local anesthesia. It is the preferred drug when a lower heart rate and blood pressure or less amnesia is needed without any serious side effects.
镇静是局部麻醉下日间口腔颌面外科手术的重要组成部分。尽管不同方案中使用了各种镇静药物进行镇静,但理想的药物和方案尚未确立。
本研究旨在比较静脉注射右美托咪定和咪达唑仑作为日间口腔颌面外科手术镇静剂的疗效。
本研究在印度奥里萨邦科塔克市SCB牙科学院和医院的口腔颌面外科进行。
总共随机选择了60名年龄在18 - 65岁之间的成年患者,男女不限,平均分为两组进行研究。一组名为D组,接受右美托咪定;另一组名为M组,接受咪达唑仑。对患者的血氧饱和度(SPO)、呼吸频率(RR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、 Ramsay镇静评分、脑电双频指数(BIS)评分、遗忘情况、Aldrete评分、手术中的松弛程度以及药物偏好进行评估。
咪达唑仑与更强遗忘作用相关。右美托咪定与较低的心率、收缩压和舒张压相关。两种药物在血氧饱和度、呼吸频率、Aldrete评分、Ramsay镇静评分和BIS评分方面无显著差异。右美托咪定组患者的偏好和松弛程度更高。
在局部麻醉下的日间口腔颌面外科手术中,静脉注射右美托咪定是一种与咪达唑仑相当的镇静替代药物。当需要较低的心率和血压或较少的遗忘作用且无严重副作用时,它是首选药物。