Mathieu Daniel, Marroni Alessandro, Kot Jacek
European Committee for Hyperbaric Medicine.
Critical Care Department, Medical University and Hospital of Lille, France.
Diving Hyperb Med. 2017 Mar;47(1):24-32. doi: 10.28920/dhm47.1.24-32.
The tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine took place in April 2016, attended by a large delegation of experts from Europe and elsewhere. The focus of the meeting was the revision of the European Committee on Hyperbaric Medicine (ECHM) list of accepted indications for hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT), based on a thorough review of the best available research and evidence-based medicine (EBM). For this scope, the modified GRADE system for evidence analysis, together with the DELPHI system for consensus evaluation, were adopted. The indications for HBOT, including those promulgated by the ECHM previously, were analysed by selected experts, based on an extensive review of the literature and of the available EBM studies. The indications were divided as follows: Type 1, where HBOT is strongly indicated as a primary treatment method, as it is supported by sufficiently strong evidence; Type 2, where HBOT is suggested as it is supported by acceptable levels of evidence; Type 3, where HBOT can be considered as a possible/optional measure, but it is not yet supported by sufficiently strong evidence. For each type, three levels of evidence were considered: A, when the number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is considered sufficient; B, when there are some RCTs in favour of the indication and there is ample expert consensus; C, when the conditions do not allow for proper RCTs but there is ample and international expert consensus. For the first time, the conference also issued 'negative' recommendations for those conditions where there is Type 1 evidence that HBOT is not indicated. The conference also gave consensus-agreed recommendations for the standard of practice of HBOT.
第十届欧洲高压氧医学共识会议于2016年4月召开,来自欧洲及其他地区的众多专家代表团出席了会议。会议的重点是修订欧洲高压氧医学委员会(ECHM)认可的高压氧治疗(HBOT)适应证清单,此次修订是在对现有最佳研究和循证医学(EBM)进行全面审查的基础上进行的。为此,采用了用于证据分析的改良GRADE系统以及用于共识评估的德尔菲系统。选定的专家在广泛查阅文献和现有循证医学研究的基础上,对包括ECHM先前公布的适应证在内的HBOT适应证进行了分析。适应证分为以下几类:1类,有充分有力的证据支持,强烈建议将HBOT作为主要治疗方法;2类,有可接受水平的证据支持,建议采用HBOT;3类,可将HBOT视为一种可能的/可选的措施,但尚无充分有力的证据支持。对于每一类,考虑了三个级别的证据:A,当随机对照试验(RCT)数量被认为足够时;B,当有一些支持该适应证的RCT且有充分的专家共识时;C,当条件不允许进行适当的RCT但有充分的国际专家共识时。会议首次还针对有1类证据表明不适用HBOT的情况发布了“否定”建议。会议还就HBOT的实践标准给出了达成共识的建议。