Center for Kidney Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Statistics Analysis, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 30;7:45757. doi: 10.1038/srep45757.
Previous studies suggested that the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) is a promising cardiovascular risk predictor. We aimed to evaluate clinical determinants of RHI and its association with circulating endothelial injury and cardiac markers in hemodialysis patients. Among 368 patients recruited, RHI was evaluated by peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) on a midweek nondialysis day. Clinical determinants of RHI were explored by multiple stepwise regression analysis and associations between RHI and circulating markers were evaluated by general linear models. The major cause of a failed PAT test was poor signal (82.1%). Intraclass correlation coefficient for reproducibility evaluation was 0.74. Multiple regression analysis showed traditional clinical factors only explained 7% of the variance of natural logarithm RHI (LnRHI) in the patients. In association analyses, LnRHI showed significant positive associations with Von Willebrand factor (vWF) (p = 0.04) and tissue factor (p = 0.047). It also associated positively with troponins (p ≤ 0.02 for both). In conclusion, performance of the PAT test was acceptable in dialysis patients and traditional clinical variables had very limited influence on RHI in these subjects. Among a panel of conventional endothelial injury markers, RHI showed very modest associations with only vWF and tissue factor. RHI associated positively with troponins in the patients.
先前的研究表明,反应性充血指数(RHI)是一种很有前途的心血管风险预测指标。我们旨在评估血液透析患者 RHI 的临床决定因素及其与循环内皮损伤和心脏标志物的关系。在招募的 368 名患者中,在非透析日的一周中间,通过外周动脉张力测定(PAT)评估 RHI。通过多元逐步回归分析探讨 RHI 的临床决定因素,并通过一般线性模型评估 RHI 与循环标志物之间的关系。PAT 测试失败的主要原因是信号不良(82.1%)。可重复性评估的组内相关系数为 0.74。多元回归分析表明,传统临床因素仅能解释患者自然对数 RHI(LnRHI)变异的 7%。在关联分析中,LnRHI 与血管性血友病因子(vWF)呈显著正相关(p=0.04),与组织因子(p=0.047)呈显著正相关。它还与肌钙蛋白呈正相关(两者均为 p≤0.02)。总之,PAT 测试在透析患者中的表现是可以接受的,传统临床变量对这些患者的 RHI 影响非常有限。在一系列常规内皮损伤标志物中,RHI 仅与 vWF 和组织因子有非常微弱的关联。RHI 与患者的肌钙蛋白呈正相关。