Suppr超能文献

一项针对接受迷走神经刺激或常规治疗的治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者的 5 年观察性研究:反应、缓解和自杀率的比较。

A 5-Year Observational Study of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation or Treatment as Usual: Comparison of Response, Remission, and Suicidality.

机构信息

From the Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore; Cyberonics, Inc., Houston; the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis; the Psychiatric Neuroscience Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Psychiatric Behavior Solutions, Salt Lake City; the Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse; and the Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;174(7):640-648. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16010034. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Treatment-Resistant Depression Registry investigated whether adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with treatment as usual in depression has superior long-term outcomes compared with treatment as usual only.

METHOD

This 5-year, prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, observational registry study was conducted at 61 U.S. sites and included 795 patients who were experiencing a major depressive episode (unipolar or bipolar depression) of at least 2 years' duration or had three or more depressive episodes (including the current episode), and who had failed four or more depression treatments (including ECT). Patients with a history of psychosis or rapid-cycling bipolar disorder were excluded. The primary efficacy measure was response rate, defined as a decrease of ≥50% in baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at any postbaseline visit during the 5-year study. Secondary efficacy measures included remission.

RESULTS

Patients had chronic moderate to severe depression at baseline (the mean MADRS score was 29.3 [SD=6.9] for the treatment-as-usual group and 33.1 [SD=7.0] for the adjunctive VNS group). The registry results indicate that the adjunctive VNS group had better clinical outcomes than the treatment-as-usual group, including a significantly higher 5-year cumulative response rate (67.6% compared with 40.9%) and a significantly higher remission rate (cumulative first-time remitters, 43.3% compared with 25.7%). A subanalysis demonstrated that among patients with a history of response to ECT, those in the adjunctive VNS group had a significantly higher 5-year cumulative response rate than those in the treatment-as-usual group (71.3% compared with 56.9%). A similar significant response differential was observed among ECT nonresponders (59.6% compared with 34.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

This registry represents the longest and largest naturalistic study of efficacy outcomes in treatment-resistant depression, and it provides additional evidence that adjunctive VNS has enhanced antidepressant effects compared with treatment as usual in this severely ill patient population.

摘要

目的

难治性抑郁症注册研究旨在调查与仅常规治疗相比,在抑郁症中添加迷走神经刺激(VNS)辅助治疗是否具有更好的长期结局。

方法

这是一项为期 5 年的前瞻性、开放标签、非随机、观察性注册研究,在美国 61 个地点进行,共纳入 795 名经历至少 2 年的单相或双相抑郁症发作(或有 3 次或更多的抑郁发作,包括当前发作),且已尝试过 4 种或更多种抗抑郁治疗(包括电休克治疗)的患者。患有精神病或快速循环性双相障碍病史的患者被排除在外。主要疗效测量指标为应答率,定义为在 5 年研究期间的任何基线后访视中基线蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分降低≥50%。次要疗效测量指标包括缓解。

结果

患者在基线时患有慢性中度至重度抑郁症(常规治疗组的平均 MADRS 评分为 29.3[SD=6.9],辅助 VNS 组为 33.1[SD=7.0])。注册结果表明,辅助 VNS 组的临床结局优于常规治疗组,包括 5 年累积应答率显著更高(67.6%比 40.9%)和缓解率显著更高(首次缓解的累积缓解率,43.3%比 25.7%)。亚分析表明,在有 ECT 治疗反应史的患者中,辅助 VNS 组的 5 年累积应答率显著高于常规治疗组(71.3%比 56.9%)。在 ECT 无反应者中也观察到类似的显著应答差异(59.6%比 34.1%)。

结论

该注册研究代表了难治性抑郁症疗效结果最长和最大的自然研究,它提供了额外的证据表明,与常规治疗相比,辅助 VNS 在这一严重疾病患者群体中具有增强的抗抑郁作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验