• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在对III期胃癌患者的生存情况进行分层时,国际胃癌联合会(IGCA)分期系统比美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版分期系统更为准确。

The IGCA staging system is more accurate than AJCC7 system in stratifying survival of patients with gastric cancer in stage III.

作者信息

Shu Ping, Qin Jing, Shen Kuntang, Chen Weidong, Liu Fenglin, Fang Yong, Wang Xuefei, Wang Hongshan, Shen Zhenbin, Sun Yihong, Qin Xinyu

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3235-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-017-3235-3
PMID:28359303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5374584/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A new staging system recently proposed by the IGCA has demonstrated a better capacity of stratifying different prognoses for gastric cancer than the 7th edition AJCC staging system (AJCC7). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the IGCA system in Chinese patients.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with gastric cancer who received curative surgery in our center from January 2003 to December 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. All the lesions were staged according to both AJCC7 and IGCA staging systems. Overall survival (OS) of the patients was used as the observation endpoint.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred twenty-six cases were included in this study. By comparing the AJCC7 system with the IGCA systems, 395 cases were stratified into different stages, most of which were in stage III. The IGCA system could better stratify stage IIIB and IIIC patients (5-year OS, 38.1% vs. 29.0%; P = 0.005) than the AJCC7 system (5-year OS, 38.2% vs. 35.9%; P = 0.148). T3N3bM0, T4aN2M0 and T4aN3bM0 made up 97.5% (385/395) of the stage shift. T3N3bM0, which was stratified to stage IIIB in the AJCC7 system, showed a significant poorer prognosis than T4aN2M0 and T4aN3aM0, which were staged to IIIB and IIIC in the same system. The improper staging was revised in the IGCA staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

The IGCA staging system can stratify stage III gastric cancer patients more properly than the AJCC7 system.

摘要

背景

国际胃癌协会(IGCA)最近提出的一种新分期系统在对胃癌不同预后进行分层方面,表现出比美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版分期系统(AJCC7)更好的能力。本研究的目的是评估IGCA系统在中国患者中的有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2003年1月至2011年12月在本中心接受根治性手术的胃癌患者的病历。所有病变均根据AJCC7和IGCA分期系统进行分期。以患者的总生存期(OS)作为观察终点。

结果

本研究纳入了1526例病例。通过比较AJCC7系统和IGCA系统,395例被分层到不同阶段,其中大多数处于III期。与AJCC7系统相比,IGCA系统能更好地对IIIB期和IIIC期患者进行分层(5年总生存率,38.1%对29.0%;P = 0.005),而AJCC7系统为(5年总生存率,38.2%对35.9%;P = 0.148)。T3N3bM0、T4aN2M0和T4aN3bM0占分期转移的97.5%(385/395)。在AJCC7系统中被分层为IIIB期的T3N3bM0,其预后明显比在同一系统中被分期为IIIB期和IIIC期的T4aN2M0和T4aN3aM0差。在IGCA分期系统中对不恰当的分期进行了修正。

结论

与AJCC7系统相比,IGCA分期系统能更恰当地对III期胃癌患者进行分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb2b/5374584/79cbe7ef6e3b/12885_2017_3235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb2b/5374584/79cbe7ef6e3b/12885_2017_3235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb2b/5374584/79cbe7ef6e3b/12885_2017_3235_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The IGCA staging system is more accurate than AJCC7 system in stratifying survival of patients with gastric cancer in stage III.在对III期胃癌患者的生存情况进行分层时,国际胃癌联合会(IGCA)分期系统比美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版分期系统更为准确。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3235-3.
2
Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project.胃癌TNM分类新分期分组的提议:国际胃癌协会分期项目
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(2):217-225. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0601-9. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
3
Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.评估第七版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌 TNM 分期系统:来自中国单机构研究的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1918-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2206-1. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
4
The 8th edition American Joint Committee on gastric cancer pathological staging classification performs well in a population with high proportion of locally advanced disease.第八版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌病理分期分类在局部进展期疾病比例较高的人群中表现良好。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;44(10):1634-1639. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.036. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
5
Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center.验证美国癌症联合委员会(第 8 版)对 III 期胃癌患者的修改:来自专门的东部中心的大型系列的生存分析。
Cancer Med. 2017 Oct;6(10):2179-2187. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1118. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database.基于国家癌症数据库验证第 8 版 AJCC TNM 胃癌分期系统。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3683-3691. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6078-x. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
7
Comparing prognostic values of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer.比较第 7 版和第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会 TNM 分期系统在胃癌预后评估中的价值。
Int J Biol Markers. 2020 Mar;35(1):26-32. doi: 10.1177/1724600819891585. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
[CT in differentiation of cT3 and cT4a Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: A comparison study based on UICC/AJCC 8th edition and IGCA 4th edition].[CT在鉴别cT3和cT4a期Siewert II型食管胃交界腺癌中的应用:基于UICC/AJCC第8版和IGCA第4版的比较研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 25;21(9):1013-1018.
9
External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.改良的第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)胃癌TNM系统的外部验证:中国南方的长期结果
Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
10
[Preliminary experience of clinical applications of the 7th UICC-AJCC TNM staging system of esophageal carcinoma].[国际抗癌联盟(UICC)-美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版食管癌TNM分期系统的临床应用初步经验]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;34(6):461-4. doi: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.06.013.

引用本文的文献

1
High Expression of AhR and Environmental Pollution as AhR-Linked Ligands Impact on Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in Western Patients with Gastric Cancer-A Pilot Study.芳香烃受体的高表达及作为芳香烃受体相关配体的环境污染对西方胃癌患者致癌信号通路的影响——一项初步研究
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 20;12(8):1905. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081905.
2
Establishment of a 7-gene expression panel to improve the prognosis classification of gastric cancer patients.建立一个7基因表达谱以改善胃癌患者的预后分类。
Front Genet. 2023 Sep 12;14:1206609. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1206609. eCollection 2023.
3
Construction and validation of a novel nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project.胃癌TNM分类新分期分组的提议:国际胃癌协会分期项目
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(2):217-225. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0601-9. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
2
Lymph Node Count as a Quality Measure for Gastric Cancer Surgery.淋巴结计数作为胃癌手术的质量指标
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jun;150(6):595-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0324.
3
Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?
一种用于预测胃腺癌患者癌症特异性生存的新型列线图的构建与验证。
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 9;13:1114847. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1114847. eCollection 2023.
4
Revisiting the 8th AJCC system for gastric cancer: A review on validations, nomograms, lymph nodes impact, and proposed modifications.重新审视第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)胃癌分期系统:关于验证、列线图、淋巴结影响及修订建议的综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Feb 25;75:103411. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103411. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
A novel nomogram for predicting survival of patients with poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.一种用于预测低分化胃腺癌患者生存情况的新型列线图。
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):886-898. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-2794.
6
Short-term survival and safety of apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in the conversion therapy of unresectable gastric cancer.阿帕替尼联合奥沙利铂和替吉奥用于不可切除胃癌转化治疗的短期生存和安全性。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 15;21(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08459-3.
7
A high level of lncFGD5-AS1 inhibits epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition by regulating the miR-196a-5p/SMAD6/BMP axis in gastric Cancer.lncFGD5-AS1 高表达通过调控 miR-196a-5p/SMAD6/BMP 轴抑制胃癌上皮间质转化。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 23;21(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08192-x.
8
Predicting gastric cancer outcome from resected lymph node histopathology images using deep learning.基于深度学习的胃淋巴结病理图像预测胃癌预后。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 12;12(1):1637. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21674-7.
9
Comparison of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant chemotherapies for stage II and III gastric cancer after D2 resection: A single-center retrospective study.S-1联合奥沙利铂(SOX)与卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(XELOX)作为Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期胃癌D2切除术后辅助化疗的比较:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun;16(3):180-186. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13321. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
10
Differential gene expression in growth factors, epithelial mesenchymal transition and chemotaxis in the diffuse type compared with the intestinal type of gastric cancer.弥漫型胃癌与肠型胃癌相比,生长因子、上皮-间质转化和趋化作用中的差异基因表达。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Jul;18(1):674-686. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10392. Epub 2019 May 21.
至少16个淋巴结清扫数目会影响胃癌根治性切除术后的生存率吗?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;41(6):779-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.227. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
4
N3 subclassification incorporated into the final pathologic staging of gastric cancer: a modified system based on current AJCC staging.纳入胃癌最终病理分期的N3亚分类:基于当前美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期的改良系统
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Feb;94(8):e575. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000575.
5
The role of the cancer center when using lymph node count as a quality measure for gastric cancer surgery.癌症中心在使用淋巴结计数作为胃癌手术质量衡量标准时的作用。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):37-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.678.
6
Validity and necessity of sub-classification of N3 in the 7th UICC TNM stage of gastric cancer.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(3):2091-5. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.3.2091.
7
Staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: comparison of AJCC 6th and 7th gastric and 7th esophageal staging systems.胃食管结合部腺癌分期:AJCC 第 6 版胃和第 7 版食管分期系统与第 7 版的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2713-20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2898-5. Epub 2013 Mar 2.
8
Should adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction be classified as esophageal cancer? A comparative analysis according to the seventh AJCC TNM classification.食管胃结合部腺癌应归类为食管癌吗?根据第七版 AJCC TNM 分类的比较分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):908-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824beb95.
9
Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.评估第七版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌 TNM 分期系统:来自中国单机构研究的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1918-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2206-1. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
10
Prognostic value of the 7th AJCC/UICC TNM classification of noncardia gastric cancer: analysis of a large series from specialized Western centers.第 7 版 AJCC/UICC 非贲门胃癌 TNM 分类的预后价值:来自专业西方中心的大型系列分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):486-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182389b1a.