• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can TAD and CalTAD predict cut-out after extra-medullary fixation with new generation devices of proximal femoral fractures? A retrospective study.TAD和CalTAD能否预测股骨近端骨折新一代髓外固定后的切出?一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures.新的尖端-顶点距离和基于 calcar 的尖端-顶点距离截断值可能是预测股骨干骨折髓内固定后切出风险的最佳指标。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04252-1.
3
Traditional distance "tip-apex" vs. new calcar referenced "tip-apex" - which one is the best peritrochanteric osteosynthesis failure predictor?传统的“尖顶-顶点”距离与新的参照“尖顶-顶点”的比较 - 哪一个是预测股骨转子间骨折内固定失败的最佳指标?
Injury. 2020 Mar;51(3):674-677. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.01.024. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Predictive value of tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for cut-out in 398 femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated in a private practice with dynamic intramedullary nailing.在一家私人诊所采用动力髓内钉治疗的398例股骨转子间骨折中,尖顶距离和以股骨距为参照的尖顶距离对穿出的预测价值。
Front Surg. 2024 Aug 14;11:1438858. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1438858. eCollection 2024.
5
A mathematical simulation of the tip-apex distance and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for intertrochanteric fractures reduced with lag screws.使用拉力螺钉复位的转子间骨折的尖顶距离和参照股骨距的尖顶距离的数学模拟。
Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.029. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
6
A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?股骨转子间骨折髓内钉固定切出风险预测因素的六年回顾性分析:尖顶距(TAD)仍可被视为最佳参数吗?
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Aug;6(8):481-488. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2016-0299.R1.
7
Correlation between cephalic screw positioning of Standard Gamma 3 Nail for intertrochanteric fractures and cut-out incidence.标准Gamma 3钉用于股骨转子间骨折时的头钉位置与穿出发生率之间的相关性。
SICOT J. 2024;10:9. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2024006. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
8
[Comparison of the predictive value of tip-apex distance and calcar referenced tip-apex distance in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with Asian type proximal femoral nail fixation].[亚洲型股骨近端髓内钉固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折时尖顶距与参照股骨距的尖顶距预测价值的比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 15;34(11):1359-1363. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202004090.
9
A new scoring system for predicting cut-out risk in patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation.新型评分系统预测股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折切出风险
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023 Sep;57(5):258-266. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.23018.
10
Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures.股骨近端骨折顺行髓内钉固定失败的预测因素。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Aug;96-B(8):1029-34. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33644.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol: biomechanical testing, finite element analysis and prospective, randomized, clinical study of single screw cephalomedullary nailing versus integrated dual interlocking screw fixation for unstable (31A2) intertrochanteric fractures in patients > 70 years old.研究方案:生物力学测试、有限元分析以及对>70 岁不稳定(31A2)转子间骨折患者行单枚斯氏针髓内钉与一体化双交锁螺钉固定的前瞻性、随机、临床研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 28;18(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04009-8.
2
New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures.新的尖端-顶点距离和基于 calcar 的尖端-顶点距离截断值可能是预测股骨干骨折髓内固定后切出风险的最佳指标。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04252-1.
3
Design of Improved Intertrochanteric Fracture Treatment (DRIFT) Study: Protocol for Biomechanical Testing and Finite Element Analysis of Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Nailing or Dynamic Compression Screw.改良股骨转子间骨折治疗设计(DRIFT)研究:髓内钉或动力加压螺钉治疗稳定型和不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的生物力学测试及有限元分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 18;8(7):e12845. doi: 10.2196/12845.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fixation options for intertrochanteric hip fractures.股骨转子间骨折固定方式的成本效益分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 1;96(19):1612-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00603.
2
Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures.股骨近端骨折顺行髓内钉固定失败的预测因素。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Aug;96-B(8):1029-34. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33644.
3
The percutaneous compression plate versus the dynamic hip screw for treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.经皮加压钢板与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Nov;98(7):773-83. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
4
Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures.预测转子间髋部骨折中螺钉切出的可靠性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1266-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00357.
5
How reliable and accurate is the AO/OTA comprehensive classification for adult long-bone fractures?成人长骨骨折的 AO/OTA 综合分类的可靠性和准确性如何?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jul;73(1):224-31. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824cf0ab.
6
Minimally invasive versus conventional dynamic hip screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in older patients.微创与传统动力髋螺钉治疗老年患者股骨粗隆间骨折的比较。
Orthopedics. 2012 Feb 17;35(2):e244-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120123-42.
7
Projected incidence of proximal femoral fracture in England: a report from the NHS Hip Fracture Anaesthesia Network (HIPFAN).英格兰股骨近端骨折预估发病率:NHS 髋关节骨折麻醉网络(HIPFAN)报告。
Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1230-3. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.010. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
8
Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing.股骨髓内钉切割的预测因素。
Injury. 2010 Dec;41(12):1312-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
9
3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre.3066 例连续 Gamma 钉。单一中心 12 年经验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jun 26;11:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-133.
10
Importance of screw position in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by dynamic hip screw.动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折时螺钉位置的重要性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Feb;96(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rcot.2009.11.004.

TAD和CalTAD能否预测股骨近端骨折新一代髓外固定后的切出?一项回顾性研究。

Can TAD and CalTAD predict cut-out after extra-medullary fixation with new generation devices of proximal femoral fractures? A retrospective study.

作者信息

Caruso Gaetano, Andreotti Mattia, Pari Carlotta, Soldati Francesco, Gildone Alessandro, Lorusso Vincenzo, Massari Leo

机构信息

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S.Anna, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.009
PMID:28360501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5359527/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary and extramedullary strategies of pertrochanteric fracture fixation are still controversial, but new percutaneous devices may give advantages regarding operative time, blood loss and rate of cardiovascular complications. We retrospectively analyze our cases regarding Anteversa plate (Intrauma, Turin, Italy) fixation of pertrochanteric femoral fractures, focusing on the correlation between two radiographical parameters (tip-apex distance "TAD" and calcar referenced tip-apex distance "CalTAD") and the occurrence of cut-out. The purpose of this study was to determine if these predicting factors of cut-out are reliable in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures with the Anteversa plate.

METHODS

A series of 77 patients with 53 31-A1 fracture types and 24-A2 fractures completed a 12-month-follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to Parker-Palmer Mobility Score at the final follow-up. TAD and CalTAD were considered to determine their correlation with cut-out events.

RESULTS

The mean Parker-Palmer Score was 6.94 in A1 group and 7.41 in A2 group ( = 0.47). Mean value of TAD index was 29.58, 29.81 in the A1 group and 29.08 in the A2 group, and mean value of CalTAD index was 30.87, 31.03 in the A1 group and 30.50 in the A2 group. We observed 3 cases of implant cut-out. We shared our sample in two groups, one group with TAD and CalTAD indices lower than 25 mm and another group higher than 25 mm to evaluate how the Palmer Parker score changed and no statistical differences were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking into consideration that good clinical results were obtained for TAD and CalTAD values superior to 25 mm, the prognostic value of 25 mm of TAD and CalTAD indices might not be appropriate to this new percutaneous plate.

摘要

背景

股骨转子周围骨折的髓内和髓外固定策略仍存在争议,但新型经皮器械在手术时间、失血量和心血管并发症发生率方面可能具有优势。我们回顾性分析了使用安特弗萨钢板(意大利都灵创伤公司)固定股骨转子周围骨折的病例,重点关注两个影像学参数(尖顶距“TAD”和参照小转子的尖顶距“CalTAD”)与内固定物穿出之间的相关性。本研究的目的是确定这些内固定物穿出的预测因素在使用安特弗萨钢板治疗股骨近端骨折时是否可靠。

方法

77例患者,其中53例为31-A1型骨折,24例为A2型骨折,完成了12个月的随访。在末次随访时根据帕克-帕尔默活动评分评估临床结果。考虑TAD和CalTAD以确定它们与内固定物穿出事件的相关性。

结果

A1组帕克-帕尔默评分均值为6.94,A2组为7.41(P = 0.47)。A1组TAD指数均值为29.58、29.81,A2组为29.08;A1组CalTAD指数均值为30.87、31.03,A2组为30.50。我们观察到3例内固定物穿出。我们将样本分为两组,一组TAD和CalTAD指数低于25mm,另一组高于25mm,以评估帕克-帕尔默评分如何变化,两组之间未发现统计学差异。

结论

考虑到TAD和CalTAD值优于25mm时获得了良好的临床结果,25mm的TAD和CalTAD指数的预后价值可能不适用于这种新型经皮钢板。