• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良股骨转子间骨折治疗设计(DRIFT)研究:髓内钉或动力加压螺钉治疗稳定型和不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的生物力学测试及有限元分析方案

Design of Improved Intertrochanteric Fracture Treatment (DRIFT) Study: Protocol for Biomechanical Testing and Finite Element Analysis of Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Nailing or Dynamic Compression Screw.

作者信息

Panagopoulos Andreas, Kyriakopoulos Georgios, Anastopoulos Georgios, Megas Panagiotis, Kourkoulis Stavros K

机构信息

Orthopaedic Department, Patras University Hospital, Patras-Rio, Greece.

First Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 18;8(7):e12845. doi: 10.2196/12845.

DOI:10.2196/12845
PMID:31322133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6670281/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intertrochanteric hip fractures rank in the top 10 of all impairments worldwide in terms of loss in disability-adjusted years for people aged older than 60 years. The type of surgery is usually carried out with dynamic hip screw (DHS) devices or cephalomedullary nails (CMN). Cut-out of the hip screw is considered the most frequent mechanical failure for all implants with an estimated incidence ranging from 2% to 16.5%; this entails both enhancing our understanding of the prognostic factors of cut-out and improving all aspects of intertrochanteric fracture treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The Design of Improved Intertrochanteric Fracture Treatment (DRIFT) study's main objective is to provide intertrochanteric fracture treatment expertise, requirements and specifications, clinical relevance, and validation to improve treatment outcomes by developing a universal algorithm for designing patient- and fracture-oriented treatment. The hypothesis to be tested is that a more valgus reduction angle and implants of higher angles will lead to a more favorable biomechanical environment for fracture healing-that is, higher compressive loads at the fracture site with lower shear loads at the hip screw femoral head interface. A new implant with enhanced biomechanical and technical characteristics will be designed and fabricated; in addition, an integrated design and optimization platform based on computer-aided design tools and topology optimization modules will be developed.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, a biomechanical study comprising experimental loading of synthetic femora (Sawbones Inc) and finite element analysis (FEA) will be conducted. Detailed FEA of existing implants (DHS and CMN) implemented in different clinical cases under walking conditions will be performed to derive the stress and strain fields developed at the implant-bone system and identify critical scenarios that could lead to failure of therapy. These models would be validated against instrumented mechanical tests using strain gages and a digital image correlation process.

RESULTS

After testing, geometric drawbacks of existing implants will be fully recognized, and geometric characteristics will be correlated with critical failure scenarios. The last step would be the numeric design, computer-aided design (using FEA codes and design packages), and optimization of the new proposed implant with regard to improved biomechanical surgical technique and enhanced mechanical performance that will reduce the possibility for critical failure scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimization of the biomechanical behavior of the fracture-osteosynthesis model by the application of the ideal reduction angle and implant is expected to have a positive effect to the rate of mechanical failure and, subsequently, the healing rates, morbidity, and mortality in this fragile patient group.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/12845.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,对于60岁以上的人群,粗隆间髋部骨折在伤残调整生命年损失方面位列所有损伤的前10位。手术类型通常采用动力髋螺钉(DHS)装置或髓内钉(CMN)。髋螺钉穿出被认为是所有植入物最常见的机械故障,估计发生率在2%至16.5%之间;这就需要我们加深对穿出预后因素的理解,并改善粗隆间骨折治疗的各个方面。

目的

改进型粗隆间骨折治疗设计(DRIFT)研究的主要目的是通过开发一种通用算法来设计以患者和骨折为导向的治疗方案,从而提供粗隆间骨折治疗的专业知识、要求和规范、临床相关性以及验证,以改善治疗效果。待检验的假设是,更大的外翻复位角度和更高角度的植入物将为骨折愈合带来更有利的生物力学环境,即骨折部位有更高的压缩载荷,而髋螺钉股骨头界面处的剪切载荷更低。将设计并制造一种具有增强生物力学和技术特性的新型植入物;此外,还将开发一个基于计算机辅助设计工具和拓扑优化模块的集成设计与优化平台。

方法

为检验这一假设,将进行一项生物力学研究,包括对合成股骨(Sawbones公司)进行实验加载和有限元分析(FEA)。将对在不同临床病例中行走条件下使用的现有植入物(DHS和CMN)进行详细的有限元分析,以得出植入物 - 骨系统中产生的应力和应变场,并识别可能导致治疗失败的关键情况。这些模型将通过使用应变片和数字图像相关过程的仪器化机械测试进行验证。

结果

测试后,将充分认识到现有植入物的几何缺陷,并将几何特征与关键失败情况相关联。最后一步将是对新提出的植入物进行数值设计、计算机辅助设计(使用有限元分析代码和设计软件包)以及优化,以改进生物力学手术技术并提高机械性能,从而降低关键失败情况发生的可能性。

结论

通过应用理想的复位角度和植入物来优化骨折内固定模型的生物力学行为,有望对这一脆弱患者群体的机械故障率以及随后的愈合率、发病率和死亡率产生积极影响。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1 - 10.2196/12845。

相似文献

1
Design of Improved Intertrochanteric Fracture Treatment (DRIFT) Study: Protocol for Biomechanical Testing and Finite Element Analysis of Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Nailing or Dynamic Compression Screw.改良股骨转子间骨折治疗设计(DRIFT)研究:髓内钉或动力加压螺钉治疗稳定型和不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的生物力学测试及有限元分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 18;8(7):e12845. doi: 10.2196/12845.
2
Optimizing fixation methods for stable and unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with sliding hip screw or cephalomedullary nailing: A comparative biomechanical and finite element analysis study.优化滑动髋螺钉或股骨近端髓内钉治疗稳定和不稳定转子间骨折的固定方法:一项比较生物力学和有限元分析研究。
Injury. 2022 Dec;53(12):4072-4085. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
3
Study protocol: biomechanical testing, finite element analysis and prospective, randomized, clinical study of single screw cephalomedullary nailing versus integrated dual interlocking screw fixation for unstable (31A2) intertrochanteric fractures in patients > 70 years old.研究方案:生物力学测试、有限元分析以及对>70 岁不稳定(31A2)转子间骨折患者行单枚斯氏针髓内钉与一体化双交锁螺钉固定的前瞻性、随机、临床研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 28;18(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04009-8.
4
Outcomes of dynamic hip screw augmented with trochanteric wiring for treatment of unstable type A2 intertrochanteric femur fractures.动力髋螺钉联合粗隆部钢丝内固定治疗不稳定型A2型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效
Injury. 2017 Aug;48 Suppl 2:S72-S77. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30498-9.
5
Prospective randomized study comparing two cephalomedullary nails for elderly intertrochanteric fractures: Zimmer natural nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation II.比较两种用于老年股骨转子间骨折的髓内钉的前瞻性随机研究:捷迈自然钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉II型
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1550-1557. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
6
Impact of tip-apex distance and femoral head lag screw position on treatment outcomes of unstable intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary nails.尖顶距和股骨头拉力螺钉位置对使用髓内钉治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折疗效的影响
J Int Med Res. 2018 Jun;46(6):2128-2140. doi: 10.1177/0300060518775835. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Biomechanical analysis of the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fracture with different lengths of dynamic hip screw side plates.动力髋螺钉侧板不同长度治疗股骨转子间骨折的生物力学分析
Technol Health Care. 2020;28(6):593-602. doi: 10.3233/THC-202248.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation implants for femoral neck fractures: A comparative finite element analysis.股骨颈骨折内固定植入物的生物力学评估:比较有限元分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105714. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105714. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Biomechanical investigation of dynamic hip screw and wire fixation on an unstable intertrochanteric fracture.动力髋螺钉和钢丝固定治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的生物力学研究。
Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Apr 24;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0663-0.
10
A newly designed locked intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures fixation: results of the first 100 Trochanteric implantations.一种新型设计的锁定髓内钉用于固定转子间髋部骨折:100 例转子间植入物的初步结果。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Apr;95(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Implants for fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.用于股骨转子间骨折固定的植入物:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 25;26(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09032-w.
2
Inverse relationship between femoral lateralization and neck-shaft angle is a joint event after intramedullary nailing of per trochanteric fractures.股骨干外侧化与颈干角之间的反相关关系是髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折后的联合事件。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 7;13(1):10999. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38209-3.
3
Standardized artificially created stable pertrochanteric femur fractures present more homogenous results compared to osteotomies for orthopaedic implant testing.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional outcomes and mortality in geriatric and fragility hip fractures-results of an integrated, multidisciplinary model experienced by the "Florence hip fracture unit".老年和脆弱性髋部骨折的功能结局和死亡率——“佛罗伦萨髋部骨折单元”经验的综合多学科模式的结果。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jan;43(1):187-192. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4132-3. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
2
Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture.髋部骨折的流行病学与社会成本
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1458-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
3
Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients.
与用于骨科植入物测试的截骨术相比,标准化人工制造的稳定股骨转子间骨折呈现出更均匀的结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 20;22(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04234-4.
4
Loss of Reduction after Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Brief Report.股骨转子间骨折顺行髓内钉固定后丢失复位:简短报告。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec;12(6):1998-2003. doi: 10.1111/os.12828. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
Clinical and functional comparison of dynamic hip screws and intramedullary nails for treating proximal femur metastases in older individuals.动力髋螺钉与髓内钉治疗老年股骨近端转移瘤的临床及功能比较
Chin J Cancer Res. 2020 Jun;32(3):395-402. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.03.10.
股骨转子间骨折髓内钉固定术后骨块游离的预测因素:一项对813例患者的回顾性研究
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Mar;138(3):351-359. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2863-z. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
4
The changing face of fractures of the hip in Northern Ireland: a 15-year review.北爱尔兰髋部骨折情况的变化:一项15年的回顾。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Sep;99-B(9):1223-1231. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1284.R1.
5
A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?股骨转子间骨折髓内钉固定切出风险预测因素的六年回顾性分析:尖顶距(TAD)仍可被视为最佳参数吗?
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Aug;6(8):481-488. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2016-0299.R1.
6
Risk factors for cut-out failure of Gamma3 nails in treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures: An analysis of 176 patients.Gamma3 钉治疗不稳定型转子间骨折切出失败的危险因素:176 例患者分析。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2017 Sep;80(9):587-594. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.04.007.
7
Comparative outcome of PFNA, Gamma nails, PCCP, Medoff plate, LISS and dynamic hip screws for fixation in elderly trochanteric fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)、伽马钉、人工股骨头置换(PCCP)、梅多夫钢板、锁定加压钢板(LISS)及动力髋螺钉用于老年转子间骨折固定的比较性结局:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Oct;27(7):937-952. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1964-2. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
8
Can TAD and CalTAD predict cut-out after extra-medullary fixation with new generation devices of proximal femoral fractures? A retrospective study.TAD和CalTAD能否预测股骨近端骨折新一代髓外固定后的切出?一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
Implant options for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: rationale, evidence, and recommendations.髋部转子间骨折治疗的植入物选择:理论依据、证据及建议。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1):128-133. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0134.R1.
10
Does an additional antirotation U-Blade (RC) lag screw improve treatment of AO/OTA 31 A1-3 fractures with gamma 3 nail?额外的抗旋转U型刀片(RC)拉力螺钉能否改善使用伽马3钉治疗AO/OTA 31 A1-3型骨折的效果?
Injury. 2016 Dec;47(12):2733-2738. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.032. Epub 2016 Oct 29.