Vergine P, Salerno C, Barca E, Berardi G, Pollice A
IRSA CNR, Viale F. De Blasio, Bari- 5 - 70132, Italy E-mail:
J Water Health. 2017 Apr;15(2):209-217. doi: 10.2166/wh.2016.119.
Escherichia coli (E. coli) is one of the most commonly adopted indicators for the determination of the microbiological quality in water and treated wastewater. Two main types of methods are used for the enumeration of this faecal indicator: membrane filtration (MF) and enzyme substrate tests. For both types, several substrates based on the β-D-glucuronidase activity have been commercialized. The specificity of this enzyme for E. coli bacteria has generated considerable use of methods that identify the β-D-glucuronidase activity as a definite indication of the presence of E. coli, without any further confirmation. This approach has been recently questioned for the application to wastewater. The present study compares two methods belonging to the above-mentioned types for the enumeration of E. coli in wastewater: MF with Tryptone Bile X-glucuronide agar and the Colilert-18 test. Confirmation tests showed low average percentages of false positives and false negatives for both enumeration methods (between 4 and 11%). Moreover, the counting capabilities of these two methods were compared for a set of 70 samples of wastewater having different origins and degrees of treatment. Statistical analysis showed that the Colilert-18 test allowed on average for a significantly higher recovery of E. coli.
大肠杆菌是用于测定水和处理后废水中微生物质量最常用的指标之一。用于计数这种粪便指示菌的主要有两种方法:膜过滤法(MF)和酶底物试验。对于这两种方法,几种基于β-D-葡萄糖醛酸酶活性的底物已商业化。这种酶对大肠杆菌的特异性使得大量使用将β-D-葡萄糖醛酸酶活性鉴定为大肠杆菌存在的确切指示的方法,无需进一步确认。最近,这种方法在废水应用方面受到了质疑。本研究比较了上述两种用于废水中大肠杆菌计数的方法:用胰蛋白胨胆盐X-葡萄糖醛酸琼脂的膜过滤法和Colilert-18试验。确认试验表明,两种计数方法的假阳性和假阴性平均百分率都很低(4%至11%之间)。此外,针对一组70个来源和处理程度不同的废水样本,比较了这两种方法的计数能力。统计分析表明,Colilert-18试验平均能显著提高大肠杆菌的回收率。