Becske Tibor, Brinjikji Waleed, Potts Matthew B, Kallmes David F, Shapiro Maksim, Moran Christopher J, Levy Elad I, McDougall Cameron G, Szikora István, Lanzino Giuseppe, Woo Henry H, Lopes Demetrius K, Siddiqui Adnan H, Albuquerque Felipe C, Fiorella David J, Saatci Isil, Cekirge Saruhan H, Berez Aaron L, Cher Daniel J, Berentei Zsolt, Marosfoi Miklós, Nelson Peter K
Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn-esota.
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):40-48. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw014.
Early and mid-term safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been well demonstrated in prior studies.
To present 5-yr follow-up for patients treated in the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms clinical trial.
In our prospective, multicenter trial, 109 complex internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms in 107 subjects were treated with the PED. Patients were followed per a standardized protocol at 180 d and 1, 3, and 5 yr. Aneurysm occlusion, in-stent stenosis, modified Rankin Scale scores, and complications were recorded.
The primary endpoint of complete aneurysm occlusion at 180 d (73.6%) was previously reported. Aneurysm occlusion for those patients with angiographic follow-up progressively increased over time to 86.8% (79/91), 93.4% (71/76), and 95.2% (60/63) at 1, 3, and 5 yr, respectively. Six aneurysms (5.7%) were retreated. New serious device-related events at 1, 3, and 5 yr were noted in 1% (1/96), 3.5% (3/85), and 0% (0/81) of subjects. There were 4 (3.7%) reported deaths in our trial. Seventy-eight (96.3%) of 81 patients with 5-yr clinical follow-up had modified Rankin Scale scores ≤2. No delayed neurological deaths or hemorrhagic or ischemic cerebrovascular events were reported beyond 6 mo. No recanalization of a previously occluded aneurysm was observed.
Our 5-yr findings demonstrate that PED is a safe and effective treatment for large and giant wide-necked aneurysms of the intracranial ICA, with high rates of complete occlusion and low rates of delayed adverse events.
既往研究已充分证明了使用密网支架(PED)治疗动脉瘤的早期和中期安全性及有效性。
介绍在不可缠绕或失败动脉瘤的密网支架治疗临床试验中接受治疗患者的5年随访情况。
在我们的前瞻性多中心试验中,对107例受试者的109个复杂颈内动脉(ICA)动脉瘤采用PED进行治疗。按照标准化方案在180天以及1年、3年和5年对患者进行随访。记录动脉瘤闭塞情况、支架内狭窄情况、改良Rankin量表评分及并发症。
先前已报道180天时动脉瘤完全闭塞这一主要终点的发生率为73.6%。进行血管造影随访的患者,动脉瘤闭塞率随时间逐渐升高,在1年、3年和5年时分别为86.8%(79/91)、93.4%(71/76)和95.2%(60/63)。6个动脉瘤(5.7%)接受了再次治疗。在1年、3年和5年时,新的严重器械相关事件在受试者中的发生率分别为1%(1/96)、3.5%(3/85)和0%(0/81)。我们的试验中有4例(3.7%)报告死亡。在81例有5年临床随访的患者中,78例(96.3%)改良Rankin量表评分≤2。6个月后未报告延迟性神经死亡或出血性或缺血性脑血管事件。未观察到先前闭塞的动脉瘤再通。
我们的5年研究结果表明,PED是治疗颅内ICA大型和巨大型宽颈动脉瘤的一种安全有效的方法,完全闭塞率高,延迟不良事件发生率低。