• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肝切除术项目的演变:203 例分析。

Evolution of a laparoscopic liver resection program: an analysis of 203 cases.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4150-4155. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5468-2. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-017-5468-2
PMID:28364151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Techniques for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have been developed over the past two decades. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes and trends of LLR.

METHODS

203 patients underwent LLR between 2006 and 2015. Trends in techniques and outcomes were assessed dividing the experience into 2 periods (before and after 2011).

RESULTS

Tumor type was malignant in 62%, and R0 resection was achieved in 87.7%. Procedures included segmentectomy/wedge resection in 64.5%. Techniques included a purely laparoscopic approach in 59.1% and robotic 12.3%. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 6.4% cases. Mean hospital stay was 3.7 ± 0.2 days. 90-day mortality was 0% and morbidity 20.2%. Pre-coagulation and the robot were used less often, while the performance of resections for posteriorly located tumors increased in the second versus the first period.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the safety and efficacy of LLR, while describing the evolution of a program regarding patient and technical selection. With building experience, the number of resections performed for posteriorly located tumors have increased, with less reliance on pre-coagulation and the robot.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肝切除术 (LLR) 技术在过去二十年中得到了发展。本研究旨在分析 LLR 的结果和趋势。

方法

203 例患者于 2006 年至 2015 年期间接受 LLR。通过将经验分为 2 个时期(2011 年之前和之后)来评估技术和结果的趋势。

结果

肿瘤类型为恶性占 62%,R0 切除率为 87.7%。手术包括节段切除术/楔形切除术占 64.5%。技术包括纯腹腔镜方法占 59.1%和机器人辅助手术占 12.3%。有 6.4%的病例需要转为开腹手术。平均住院时间为 3.7±0.2 天。90 天死亡率为 0%,发病率为 20.2%。术前凝血和机器人辅助手术的使用频率降低,而在第二阶段,后位肿瘤切除术的数量增加。

结论

本研究证实了 LLR 的安全性和有效性,同时描述了患者和技术选择方面的项目演变。随着经验的积累,后位肿瘤的切除术数量增加,对术前凝血和机器人的依赖减少。

相似文献

1
Evolution of a laparoscopic liver resection program: an analysis of 203 cases.腹腔镜肝切除术项目的演变:203 例分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4150-4155. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5468-2. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
2
Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis.机器人辅助肝切除术与腹腔镜肝切除术的临床疗效比较:荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0240593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240593. eCollection 2020.
3
Multimodality laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic malignancy--from conventional total laparoscopic approach to robot-assisted laparoscopic approach.多模态腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝恶性肿瘤——从传统全腹腔镜方法到机器人辅助腹腔镜方法。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(4):324-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
4
Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术:一项对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1914-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9070-4. Epub 2003 Oct 28.
5
Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections.微创肝切除术应用相关的变化趋势和结果:单中心 400 例连续切除术的当代经验
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4658-4665. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6310-1. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A 7-Year Experience of 123 Resections in a Single Institution.腹腔镜肝切除术:单中心 7 年 123 例经验总结。
Am Surg. 2020 Oct;86(10):1330-1336. doi: 10.1177/0003134820964442. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
7
Laparoscopic liver resection: initial experience in a North-African single center.腹腔镜肝切除术:北非单中心的初步经验
Tunis Med. 2015 Aug-Sep;93(8-9):523-6.
8
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatic Resection for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Less Than 5 cm in Cirrhotic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝硬化患者直径小于5厘米的孤立性肝细胞癌:一项随机对照研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):302-310. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0518. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
9
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for hepatocellular adenoma: a multicenter propensity score adjustment analysis by the AFC-HCA-2013 study group.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞腺瘤的短期疗效:AFC-HCA-2013 研究组的多中心倾向评分调整分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4136-4144. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5466-4. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
10
Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experience of 436 Cases in One Center.腹腔镜肝切除术:单中心 436 例经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4023-3. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: short- and long-term outcomes with blood loss.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌:失血相关的短期和长期结果
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Oct;10(10):4303-4315. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-463.
2
The utility of laparoscopic ultrasound during minimally invasive liver procedures in patients with malignant liver tumors who have undergone preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.腹腔镜超声在经术前磁共振成像检查的恶性肝肿瘤患者微创肝手术中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4939-4945. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08849-5. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
3
Mid-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Cystectomy Versus Open Surgery for Complicated Liver Hydatid Cysts.

本文引用的文献

1
Short and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic compared to open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除治疗结直肠癌肝转移的短期和长期结局
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016 Aug;5(4):300-10. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.02.01.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterosuperior segments or anterolateral segments: A case-matched analysis.位于肝后上段或肝前外侧段的肝细胞癌的腹腔镜肝切除术比较:病例匹配分析
Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1219-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
3
Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive?
腹腔镜肝包虫囊肿完整切除术与开腹手术治疗复杂肝包虫囊肿的中期疗效比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Aug 5;31(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000822.
4
Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experience of 436 Cases in One Center.腹腔镜肝切除术:单中心 436 例经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4023-3. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
机器人肝切除术的疗效与成本:机器人是否成本过高?
J Robot Surg. 2016 Dec;10(4):307-313. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0598-4. Epub 2016 May 6.
4
Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral lesions-a comparison experience in an Asian centre.亚洲中心腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝后上和肝前外侧病变的比较经验
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2015 Dec;4(6):379-90. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.06.06.
5
Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing.腹腔镜肝切除术的短期比较效益:9000例且仍在增加。
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):761-77. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413.
6
Approaches to laparoscopic liver resection: a meta-analysis of the role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and the hybrid technique.腹腔镜肝切除术的方法:手辅助腹腔镜手术和杂交技术作用的荟萃分析
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 May;22(5):335-41. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.214. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
Laparoscopic liver resection for malignancy: a review of the literature.腹腔镜下恶性肿瘤肝切除术:文献综述
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 7;20(37):13599-606. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13599.
8
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a meta-analysis of long-term outcome.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术:长期疗效的荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Feb;16(2):109-18. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12117. Epub 2013 May 15.
9
Complementary use of resection and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases: an analysis of 395 patients.切除联合射频消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移:395 例患者分析。
World J Surg. 2013 Jun;37(6):1333-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1981-1.
10
Evaluation of stapler hepatectomy during a laparoscopic liver resection.腹腔镜肝切除术中吻合器肝切除术的评估
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Nov;15(11):845-50. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12043. Epub 2013 Jan 18.