• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肝包虫囊肿完整切除术与开腹手术治疗复杂肝包虫囊肿的中期疗效比较

Mid-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Cystectomy Versus Open Surgery for Complicated Liver Hydatid Cysts.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Aug 5;31(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000822.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000822
PMID:32769743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8096310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total cystectomy is a challenging procedure in patients with complicated liver hydatid cysts (HCs). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total cystectomy in patients with complicated liver HCs.

METHODS

Prospectively collected clinical data of 50 consecutive patients, who underwent laparoscopic procedures for complicated liver HCs between January 2017 and January 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred patients who underwent open procedures were compared with the laparoscopic group in terms of perioperative outcomes during the 1-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Conversion to open surgery occurred in 1 (2%) case. The number of single and multiple lesions and the size of HCs were similar between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Sixty-six percent of patients underwent total cystectomy, 10% subtotal cystectomy, and 24% hepatectomy in the laparoscopic group (P>0.05). Decompression and hepatic inflow occlusion were performed in high-risk cases. No differences were noted in average blood loss volume, and transfusion rate between the 2 groups. Postoperative recovery in the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than that in the open group. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the laparoscopic and open groups. No recurrence or death was observed in either group during this period.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic total cystectomy was a curative and safe surgical approach to the treatment of complicated HC with favorable mid-term outcomes. Subtotal cystectomy combined with decompression is the preferred option for patients with high surgical risk(s). However, long-term outcomes need to be validated in prospective studies with larger sample sizes and prolonged follow-up.

摘要

背景

对于合并复杂肝脏包虫囊肿(HC)的患者,全囊切除术是一项具有挑战性的操作。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜全囊切除术治疗合并复杂肝脏 HC 的可行性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析了 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间 50 例连续接受腹腔镜手术的合并复杂肝脏 HC 患者的前瞻性收集的临床资料。在 1 年的随访期间,将这 50 例患者与 100 例接受开放手术的患者进行了比较,比较了围手术期结果。

结果

1 例(2%)患者转为开放手术。两组患者的单发和多发病变数量以及 HC 大小相似(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组中 66%的患者行全囊切除术,10%行次全囊切除术,24%行肝切除术(P>0.05)。高危病例行减压和肝血流阻断。两组间平均出血量和输血率无差异。腹腔镜组术后恢复明显短于开放组。腹腔镜组和开放组术后并发症发生率无差异。两组患者在随访期间均无复发或死亡。

结论

腹腔镜全囊切除术是治疗合并复杂 HC 的一种有疗效且安全的手术方法,具有良好的中期结果。对于高手术风险的患者,次全囊切除术联合减压是首选。然而,需要前瞻性研究更大样本量和更长随访时间来验证长期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da40/8096310/7d89a32f195b/sle-31-044-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da40/8096310/ce6e5fd6818c/sle-31-044-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da40/8096310/25a56d07dacf/sle-31-044-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da40/8096310/e911b8a32276/sle-31-044-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da40/8096310/7d89a32f195b/sle-31-044-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da40/8096310/ce6e5fd6818c/sle-31-044-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da40/8096310/25a56d07dacf/sle-31-044-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da40/8096310/e911b8a32276/sle-31-044-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da40/8096310/7d89a32f195b/sle-31-044-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Mid-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Cystectomy Versus Open Surgery for Complicated Liver Hydatid Cysts.腹腔镜肝包虫囊肿完整切除术与开腹手术治疗复杂肝包虫囊肿的中期疗效比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Aug 5;31(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000822.
2
Current approaches in the surgical treatment of liver hydatid disease: single center experience.肝包虫病外科治疗的当前方法:单中心经验
BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 17;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0553-1.
3
[LIVER CYSTIC ECHINOCOCCOSIS LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS].[肝囊性包虫病的腹腔镜治疗效果]
Georgian Med News. 2018 May(278):20-25.
4
Laparoscopic radical and conservative surgery for hydatid liver echinococcosis: PSM based comparative analysis of immediate and long-term outcomes.腹腔镜根治性和保守性手术治疗肝包虫病:基于倾向性评分匹配的即刻和长期疗效比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1224-1233. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08391-4. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
5
Therapeutic Options in Hydatid Hepatic Cyst Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of Three Surgical Approaches.肝包虫囊肿手术的治疗选择:三种手术方法的回顾性分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 30;14(13):1399. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131399.
6
Laparoscopic treatment of hepatic hydatid cysts. Our approach.肝包虫囊肿的腹腔镜治疗。我们的方法。
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:560-564.
7
Open or laparoscopic treatment for hydatid disease of the liver? A 10-year single-institution experience.肝包虫病的开腹或腹腔镜治疗? 10 年单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):2110-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2719-0. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
8
Subadventitial cystectomy in the management of biliary fistula with liver hydatid disease.肝包虫病合并胆瘘的治疗中采用外膜下囊肿切除术。
Acta Trop. 2015 Jan;141(Pt B):223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
9
Evaluation and Comparison of the Early Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery of Liver Hydatid Cyst.肝包虫囊肿开放手术与腹腔镜手术早期疗效的评估与比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Oct;25(5):403-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000199.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the treatment of liver hydatid cyst: Comparing laparoscopic and open surgeries.肝包虫囊肿治疗的系统评价与荟萃分析:腹腔镜手术与开放手术的比较
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;18(3):127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Pancreatitis as a Complication of a Hydatid Liver Cyst.急性胰腺炎作为肝包虫囊肿的一种并发症
Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2025 Aug 8;2025:1244948. doi: 10.1155/crgm/1244948. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Current approaches in the surgical treatment of liver hydatid disease: single center experience.肝包虫病外科治疗的当前方法:单中心经验
BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 17;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0553-1.
2
Echinococcosis: Advances in the 21st Century.包虫病:21 世纪的进展。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Feb 13;32(2). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00075-18. Print 2019 Mar 20.
3
Retrospective Study of Cystic Echinococcosis in a Recent Cohort of a Referral Center for Liver Surgery.回顾性研究某肝外科转诊中心近期一组病例中的肝包虫病。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jun;23(6):1148-1156. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3971-y. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
Major hepatectomies in liver cystic echinococcosis: A bi-centric experience. Retrospective cohort study.肝包虫病的大肝切除术:一项双中心经验。回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):182-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.049. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
Recurrence of cystic echinococcosis in an endemic area: a retrospective study.地方流行区囊性棘球蚴病的复发:一项回顾性研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 27;17(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2556-9.
6
Evolution of a laparoscopic liver resection program: an analysis of 203 cases.腹腔镜肝切除术项目的演变:203 例分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4150-4155. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5468-2. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
7
Current status of diagnosis and treatment of hepatic echinococcosis.肝包虫病的诊断与治疗现状
World J Hepatol. 2016 Oct 8;8(28):1169-1181. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i28.1169.
8
Evaluation and Comparison of the Early Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery of Liver Hydatid Cyst.肝包虫囊肿开放手术与腹腔镜手术早期疗效的评估与比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Oct;25(5):403-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000199.
9
Efficacy of Albendazole-Chitosan Microsphere-based Treatment for Alveolar Echinococcosis in Mice.基于阿苯达唑-壳聚糖微球的治疗对小鼠肺泡型棘球蚴病的疗效
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Sep 9;9(9):e0003950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003950. eCollection 2015.
10
The Comparison of 2 New Promising Weapons for the Treatment of Hydatid Cyst Disease: PAIR and Laparoscopic Therapy.两种治疗包虫囊肿病的新的有前景的方法比较:穿刺抽液注药术和腹腔镜治疗。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Aug;25(4):358-62. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000177.