İnönü Köseoğlu Handan, Kanbay Asiye, Acıcan Turan
Department of Chest Diseases, Research and Practice Hospital, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey.
Tuberk Toraks. 2016 Dec;64(4):299-305. doi: 10.5578/tt.28034.
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is an important public health problem seen in 14.3% of male, and 5% of female population which leads to higher morbidity, and mortality rates because of its outcomes effecting many organ systems including cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular systems. Despite its higher prevalence in community, sleep laboratories both in our country, and in the world remain incapable of diagnosing these patients, and 80-90% of the cases with OSAS can not be diagnosed. As an alternative to gold standard polysomnographic examinations this desperate condition revived the use of more practical, and less expensive portable monitorization devices which can be used at home without the need for help of a technician. In this article we will discuss whether application of sleep test on a patient with suspect OSAS in the laboratory or at home will be more appropriate regarding effectiveness, and reliability of the test in the light of the scientific data.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)是一个重要的公共卫生问题,在14.3%的男性和5%的女性人群中可见。由于其影响包括心血管和脑血管系统在内的许多器官系统,导致发病率和死亡率升高。尽管其在社区中的患病率较高,但我国和世界的睡眠实验室仍无法诊断这些患者,80-90%的OSAS病例无法被诊断。作为金标准多导睡眠图检查的替代方法,这种严峻的情况促使人们使用更实用、更便宜的便携式监测设备,这些设备可以在家中使用,无需技术人员的帮助。在本文中,我们将根据科学数据,从测试的有效性和可靠性方面讨论,对疑似OSAS患者在实验室或在家中进行睡眠测试哪种更合适。