Suppr超能文献

食品安全与特定商店和总体食品购物行为之间的关系。

The Association between Food Security and Store-Specific and Overall Food Shopping Behaviors.

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;117(12):1931-1940. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Food security is a severe problem in the United States. Few studies have examined its relationship with food shopping behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the association between food security and store-specific and overall food shopping among residents of low-income neighborhoods.

DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Five hundred twenty-seven households were recruited from two counties in South Carolina from November 2013 to May 2014, and 474 households were included in the final analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Food security was assessed using the 18-item US-Household Food Security Module questionnaire, and classified into three categories: high or marginal food security (FS), low food security (LFS), and very low food security (VLFS). Store-specific shopping behaviors including frequency, store type, and transportation were queried via in-person interview for the three most-frequented grocery stores. Distance from participants' homes to their reported stores was calculated using Geographic Information Systems.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Multivariate linear regression for analyses of distance and frequency and multinomial/ordinary logistic regression for analyses of store type and transportation were used.

RESULTS

Compared to FS participants, a significantly higher proportion of VLFS participants reported a convenience/dollar store as their most-frequented store (odds ratio [OR] 2.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.95) or a lack of transportation (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.33). They also shopped less frequently (b=-.31, P=0.03) at their third most-frequented store and traveled fewer total miles for shopping (b=-4.71, P=0.04). In analyses considering all stores jointly, LFS participants had lower odds of shopping at both supermarkets and convenience/dollar stores (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.91) compared to food-secure residents.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings suggest that households with VLFS tend to shop more frequently in stores that have less-healthful options, such as convenience/dollar stores. These findings lend support to ongoing community and policy interventions aimed at improving food access among food-insecure populations.

摘要

背景

食品安全在美国是一个严重的问题。很少有研究探讨它与食品购物行为的关系。

目的

本研究旨在检验低收入社区居民的食品安全感与特定商店和整体食品购物之间的关联。

设计

我们进行了一项横断面研究。

参与者/设置:2013 年 11 月至 2014 年 5 月,从南卡罗来纳州的两个县招募了 527 户家庭,最终有 474 户家庭纳入了最终分析。

主要观察指标

使用美国家庭食品安全模块问卷的 18 项评估食品安全感,并分为三类:高或边缘食品安全(FS)、低食品安全感(LFS)和极低食品安全感(VLFS)。通过面对面访谈询问参与者最常光顾的三家杂货店的购物频率、商店类型和交通方式。使用地理信息系统计算参与者家庭与报告商店之间的距离。

统计分析

多元线性回归用于分析距离和频率,多项/普通逻辑回归用于分析商店类型和交通方式。

结果

与 FS 参与者相比,VLFS 参与者报告便利店/折扣店为其最常光顾的商店的比例显著更高(比值比[OR]2.31,95%置信区间[CI]1.08 至 4.95)或缺乏交通工具(OR 2.04,95%CI1.25 至 3.33)。他们在第三常光顾的商店购物的频率也较低(b=-.31,P=0.03),购物总里程数也较少(b=-4.71,P=0.04)。在同时考虑所有商店的分析中,LFS 参与者在超市和便利店/折扣店购物的可能性均较低(OR0.44,95%CI0.21 至 0.91),而食品安全的居民则较低。

结论

目前的研究结果表明,VLFS 家庭倾向于更频繁地在便利/折扣店等健康选择较少的商店购物。这些发现为旨在改善食品不安全人群食品获取的社区和政策干预提供了支持。

相似文献

1
The Association between Food Security and Store-Specific and Overall Food Shopping Behaviors.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;117(12):1931-1940. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
2
Disparities in Access to Healthy Diets: How Food Security and Food Shopping Behaviors Relate to Fruit and Vegetable Intake.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Nov;120(11):1847-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
Food Shopping and Acquisition Behaviors in Relation to BMI among Residents of Low-Income Communities in South Carolina.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 16;14(9):1075. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091075.
4
Food Acquisition and Shopping Patterns among Residents of Low-Income and Low-Access Communities in South Carolina.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Oct;118(10):1844-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
5
Perceived and geographic food access and food security status among households with children.
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(15):2781-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000859. Epub 2016 May 2.
7
Maternal Strategies to Access Food Differ by Food Security Status.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Jan;117(1):48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
9
Where people shop is not associated with the nutrient quality of packaged foods for any racial-ethnic group in the United States.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;103(4):1125-34. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.121806. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

2
Personal vehicle use and food security among US adults who are primary shoppers for households with children.
Discov Food. 2023;3(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s44187-023-00048-6. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Regional differences, distributional dynamics and convergence of multidimensional food security levels in China.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 16;19(8):e0309071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309071. eCollection 2024.
7
10
Changes of Grocery Shopping Frequencies and Associations with Food Deserts during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.
J Urban Health. 2023 Oct;100(5):950-961. doi: 10.1007/s11524-023-00772-5. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities in the healthiness of food choices: Exploring the contributions of food expenditures.
Prev Med. 2016 Jul;88:203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
3
Food insecurity and dietary quality in US adults and children: a systematic review.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug;100(2):684-92. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.084525. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
4
Differences in food environment perceptions and spatial attributes of food shopping between residents of low and high food access areas.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(4):241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
5
Environmental influences on fruit and vegetable intake: results from a path analytic model.
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Nov;17(11):2595-604. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002930. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
6
A food retail-based intervention on food security and consumption.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Aug 5;10(8):3325-46. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10083325.
7
Food environment and socioeconomic status influence obesity rates in Seattle and in Paris.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Feb;38(2):306-14. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.97. Epub 2013 May 27.
8
A food desert in Detroit: associations with food shopping and eating behaviours, dietary intakes and obesity.
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(12):2114-23. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000967. Epub 2013 May 7.
9
Food shopping behaviours and exposure to discrimination.
Public Health Nutr. 2014 May;17(5):1167-76. doi: 10.1017/S136898001300075X. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验