J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;117(12):1931-1940. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Food security is a severe problem in the United States. Few studies have examined its relationship with food shopping behaviors.
This study aimed to examine the association between food security and store-specific and overall food shopping among residents of low-income neighborhoods.
We conducted a cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Five hundred twenty-seven households were recruited from two counties in South Carolina from November 2013 to May 2014, and 474 households were included in the final analysis.
Food security was assessed using the 18-item US-Household Food Security Module questionnaire, and classified into three categories: high or marginal food security (FS), low food security (LFS), and very low food security (VLFS). Store-specific shopping behaviors including frequency, store type, and transportation were queried via in-person interview for the three most-frequented grocery stores. Distance from participants' homes to their reported stores was calculated using Geographic Information Systems.
Multivariate linear regression for analyses of distance and frequency and multinomial/ordinary logistic regression for analyses of store type and transportation were used.
Compared to FS participants, a significantly higher proportion of VLFS participants reported a convenience/dollar store as their most-frequented store (odds ratio [OR] 2.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.95) or a lack of transportation (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.33). They also shopped less frequently (b=-.31, P=0.03) at their third most-frequented store and traveled fewer total miles for shopping (b=-4.71, P=0.04). In analyses considering all stores jointly, LFS participants had lower odds of shopping at both supermarkets and convenience/dollar stores (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.91) compared to food-secure residents.
The current findings suggest that households with VLFS tend to shop more frequently in stores that have less-healthful options, such as convenience/dollar stores. These findings lend support to ongoing community and policy interventions aimed at improving food access among food-insecure populations.
食品安全在美国是一个严重的问题。很少有研究探讨它与食品购物行为的关系。
本研究旨在检验低收入社区居民的食品安全感与特定商店和整体食品购物之间的关联。
我们进行了一项横断面研究。
参与者/设置:2013 年 11 月至 2014 年 5 月,从南卡罗来纳州的两个县招募了 527 户家庭,最终有 474 户家庭纳入了最终分析。
使用美国家庭食品安全模块问卷的 18 项评估食品安全感,并分为三类:高或边缘食品安全(FS)、低食品安全感(LFS)和极低食品安全感(VLFS)。通过面对面访谈询问参与者最常光顾的三家杂货店的购物频率、商店类型和交通方式。使用地理信息系统计算参与者家庭与报告商店之间的距离。
多元线性回归用于分析距离和频率,多项/普通逻辑回归用于分析商店类型和交通方式。
与 FS 参与者相比,VLFS 参与者报告便利店/折扣店为其最常光顾的商店的比例显著更高(比值比[OR]2.31,95%置信区间[CI]1.08 至 4.95)或缺乏交通工具(OR 2.04,95%CI1.25 至 3.33)。他们在第三常光顾的商店购物的频率也较低(b=-.31,P=0.03),购物总里程数也较少(b=-4.71,P=0.04)。在同时考虑所有商店的分析中,LFS 参与者在超市和便利店/折扣店购物的可能性均较低(OR0.44,95%CI0.21 至 0.91),而食品安全的居民则较低。
目前的研究结果表明,VLFS 家庭倾向于更频繁地在便利/折扣店等健康选择较少的商店购物。这些发现为旨在改善食品不安全人群食品获取的社区和政策干预提供了支持。