Stern Dalia, Poti Jennifer M, Ng Shu Wen, Robinson Whitney R, Gordon-Larsen Penny, Popkin Barry M
Departments of Nutrition and.
Departments of Nutrition and Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and USDA Duke-University of North Carolina Collaborative Center for Behavioral Economics and Healthier Food Choice Research (BECR), Durham-Chapel Hill, NC.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;103(4):1125-34. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.121806. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
In the literature, it has been suggested that there are race-ethnic disparities in what Americans eat. In addition, some studies have shown that residents of African American and low-income neighborhoods have less access to grocery stores and supermarkets, which tend to stock healthier foods. However, it is unclear whether differences in food shopping patterns contribute to the poorer nutrient profile of food purchases made by racial-ethnic minorities.
We examined whether the mix of food stores where people shop (i.e., food-shopping patterns) was associated with the nutrient profile of packaged food purchases (PFPs) and the types of foods and beverages purchased, and we determined whether these associations differ across racial-ethnic groups.
We used PFPs by US households (Nielsen National Consumer Panel) from 2007 to 2012 and implemented a cluster analysis to categorize households according to their food-shopping patterns. Longitudinal random-effects linear regression models were used to examine the association between food shopping patterns and the nutrient qualities and types of packaged foods and beverages purchased by race-ethnicity in US households.
Shopping primarily at grocery chains was not associated with a better nutrient profile of household PFPs or the food and beverages that households purchased than was shopping primarily at mass merchandisers (value-oriented stores that sell merchandise lines in multiple departments) or at a combination of large and small stores. These results were consistent across racial-ethnic groups. Regardless of where households shopped, non-Hispanic African American households purchased foods with higher energy, total sugar, and sodium densities than did non-Hispanic white and Hispanic households.
Policy initiatives that focus on increasing physical access to stores or helping stores sell healthier products to encourage healthier purchases may be ineffective because other factors may be more important determinants of food and beverage purchases than where people shop or what is available in the store.
文献表明,美国人的饮食存在种族差异。此外,一些研究显示,非裔美国人和低收入社区的居民前往杂货店和超市购物的机会较少,而这些店铺往往储备有更健康的食品。然而,尚不清楚食品购买模式的差异是否导致了少数族裔购买的食品营养状况较差。
我们研究了人们购物的食品店组合(即食品购买模式)是否与包装食品购买(PFPs)的营养状况以及所购买的食品和饮料类型相关,并确定这些关联在不同种族群体中是否存在差异。
我们使用了2007年至2012年美国家庭的包装食品购买数据(尼尔森全国消费者小组),并进行聚类分析,根据家庭的食品购买模式对其进行分类。纵向随机效应线性回归模型用于研究美国家庭食品购买模式与按种族划分的包装食品和饮料的营养质量及类型之间的关联。
与主要在大型综合零售商(销售多个部门商品系列的以价值为导向的商店)或大小商店组合购物相比,主要在连锁杂货店购物与家庭包装食品购买的更好营养状况或家庭购买的食品和饮料之间没有关联。这些结果在不同种族群体中是一致的。无论家庭在哪里购物,非西班牙裔非裔美国家庭购买的食品的能量、总糖和钠密度均高于非西班牙裔白人和西班牙裔家庭。
专注于增加商店的实际可达性或帮助商店销售更健康产品以鼓励更健康购买的政策举措可能无效,因为其他因素可能比人们在哪里购物或商店里有什么更能决定食品和饮料的购买。