• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过触觉反馈和3D视觉在虚拟现实中更快地掌握腹腔镜手术技能。

Faster acquisition of laparoscopic skills in virtual reality with haptic feedback and 3D vision.

作者信息

Hagelsteen Kristine, Langegård Anders, Lantz Adam, Ekelund Mikael, Anderberg Magnus, Bergenfelz Anders

机构信息

a Practicum Clinical Skills Center, Skåne University Hospital , Lund , Sweden.

b Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery , Lund University, Skåne University Hospital , Lund , Sweden.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017 Oct;26(5):269-277. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1305970. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1080/13645706.2017.1305970
PMID:28367667
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study investigated whether 3D vision and haptic feedback in combination in a virtual reality environment leads to more efficient learning of laparoscopic skills in novices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty novices were allocated to two groups. All completed a training course in the LapSim virtual reality trainer consisting of four tasks: 'instrument navigation', 'grasping', 'fine dissection' and 'suturing'. The study group performed with haptic feedback and 3D vision and the control group without. Before and after the LapSim course, the participants' metrics were recorded when tying a laparoscopic knot in the 2D video box trainer Simball Box.

RESULTS

The study group completed the training course in 146 (100-291) minutes compared to 215 (175-489) minutes in the control group (p = .002). The number of attempts to reach proficiency was significantly lower. The study group had significantly faster learning of skills in three out of four individual tasks; instrument navigation, grasping and suturing. Using the Simball Box, no difference in laparoscopic knot tying after the LapSim course was noted when comparing the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic training in virtual reality with 3D vision and haptic feedback made training more time efficient and did not negatively affect later video box-performance in 2D. [Formula: see text].

摘要

背景

本研究调查了虚拟现实环境中3D视觉与触觉反馈相结合是否能使新手更有效地学习腹腔镜技能。

材料与方法

20名新手被分为两组。所有人都在LapSim虚拟现实训练器中完成了一个培训课程,该课程由四项任务组成:“器械导航”“抓持”“精细解剖”和“缝合”。研究组在有触觉反馈和3D视觉的条件下进行训练,而对照组则没有。在LapSim课程前后,记录参与者在2D视频盒训练器Simball Box中打腹腔镜结时的各项指标。

结果

研究组完成培训课程用时146(100 - 291)分钟,而对照组用时215(175 - 489)分钟(p = 0.002)。达到熟练水平所需的尝试次数显著更少。研究组在四项单独任务中的三项——器械导航、抓持和缝合中,技能学习速度明显更快。使用Simball Box进行比较时,在LapSim课程后两组在腹腔镜结打结方面未发现差异。

结论

在虚拟现实中进行的具有3D视觉和触觉反馈的腹腔镜训练使训练更具时间效率,并且对之后在2D视频盒中的操作表现没有负面影响。[公式:见正文]

相似文献

1
Faster acquisition of laparoscopic skills in virtual reality with haptic feedback and 3D vision.通过触觉反馈和3D视觉在虚拟现实中更快地掌握腹腔镜手术技能。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017 Oct;26(5):269-277. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1305970. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
2
Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.腹腔镜计算机模拟器与箱式训练器在新手内镜手术训练中的效果比较。
J Surg Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;68(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 May 4.
3
Performance and perception of haptic feedback in a laparoscopic 3D virtual reality simulator.腹腔镜3D虚拟现实模拟器中触觉反馈的性能与感知
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019 Oct;28(5):309-316. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1539012. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
4
Prospective Cohort Study of Haptic Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Learning Curve Trajectory.触觉虚拟现实腹腔镜阑尾切除术学习曲线轨迹的前瞻性队列研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Sep;29(9):1128-1134. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0332. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
Preliminary study of virtual reality and model simulation for learning laparoscopic suturing skills.虚拟现实与模型模拟用于学习腹腔镜缝合技能的初步研究
J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1018-25. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.016. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
6
Can 3D Vision Improve Laparoscopic Performance in Box Simulation Training when Compared to Conventional 2D Vision?与传统二维视觉相比,三维视觉能否在箱式模拟训练中提高腹腔镜手术操作水平?
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2019 Dec 31;61(4):491-499. doi: 10.3897/folmed.61.e47958.
7
Laparoscopic virtual reality simulator and box trainer in gynecology.妇科腹腔镜虚拟现实模拟器和箱式训练器
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 May;125(2):181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.10.018. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
8
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Trainee-Directed Virtual Reality Simulation Training and Box Trainer on the Acquisition of Laparoscopic Suturing Skills.一项比较学员主导的虚拟现实模拟训练与箱式训练器在腹腔镜缝合技能习得方面的随机对照试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Mar;40(3):310-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Lack of transfer of skills after virtual reality simulator training with haptic feedback.虚拟现实模拟器训练并伴有触觉反馈后技能转移的缺失。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017 Dec;26(6):346-354. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1319866. Epub 2017 May 9.
10
Saving robots improves laparoscopic performance: transfer of skills from a serious game to a virtual reality simulator.保存机器人可提高腹腔镜手术技能:从严肃游戏到虚拟现实模拟器的技能转移。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3192-3199. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6036-0. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Findings Favor Haptics Feedback in Virtual Simulation Surgical Education: An Updated Systematic and Scoping Review.研究结果支持触觉反馈在虚拟仿真手术教学中的应用:一项更新的系统评价和范围综述。
Surg Innov. 2024 Jun;31(3):331-341. doi: 10.1177/15533506241238263. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Utilization of and perceived need for simulators in clinical electrophysiology: results from an EHRA physician survey.临床电生理学中模拟器的使用和感知需求:来自 EHRA 医师调查的结果。
Europace. 2024 Feb 1;26(2). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae037.
3
Using Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays to Assess Skills in Emergency Medicine: Validity Study.
使用虚拟现实头戴式显示器评估急诊医学技能:有效性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 6;25:e45210. doi: 10.2196/45210.
4
Visuospatial ability is associated to 2D laparoscopic simulator performance amongst surgical residents.在外科住院医师中,视觉空间能力与二维腹腔镜模拟器操作表现相关。
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Dec 7;11:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.004. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Impact of haptic feedback on surgical training outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Trial of haptic versus non-haptic immersive virtual reality training.触觉反馈对外科手术训练结果的影响:触觉与非触觉沉浸式虚拟现实训练的随机对照试验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Sep 23;83:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104734. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Virtual Reality in Medical Students' Education: Scoping Review.虚拟现实在医学生教育中的应用:范围综述
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Feb 2;8(1):e34860. doi: 10.2196/34860.
7
A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students.一项使用骨盆训练模型,针对专家、非专家和学生对3D与2D成像系统进行研究的腹腔镜研究。
BMC Surg. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00892-8.
8
Pre-graduation medical training including virtual reality during COVID-19 pandemic: a report on students' perception.新冠疫情期间的毕业前医学培训,包括虚拟现实:学生感知报告。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02245-8.
9
Virtual versus jaw simulation in Oral implant education: a randomized controlled trial.虚拟与颌骨模拟在口腔种植教育中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 18;20(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02152-y.