• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

G-CPAQ 的建构效度及其在疼痛干扰和调整中的中介作用。

Construct validity of the G-CPAQ and its mediating role in pain interference and adjustment.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, ACTHealthy Laboratory, University of Cyprus.

Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2018 Feb;30(2):220-230. doi: 10.1037/pas0000467. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000467
PMID:28368172
Abstract

The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) is a measure of pain acceptance comprised of pain willingness (PW) and activity engagement (AE; McCracken et al., 2004). Concerns about the factorial structure of the CPAQ exist, as it is not yet clear whether PW and AE constitute 2 independent constructs or 1, pain acceptance. Concerns also exist about the internal and predictive validity of test score interpretations of this measure. This study also presents that the choice of predictor variables has contributed to theoretical confusion regarding the impact of pain acceptance on pain-related adjustment. The purpose of this study was: (a) to examine the psychometric properties of both the long (20 items) and short (8 items) versions of the Greek-Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (G-CPAQ); (b) to examine the utility of a 2-factor solution in predicting psychosocial adjustment to pain using confirmatory factor analysis; and (c) to explore the mediating effects of pain acceptance and cognitive defusion, comprising the "open" response style to pain, between pain interference and pain related outcomes. One hundred and sixty chronic pain patients completed a questionnaire packet including pain indexes, pain acceptance, cognitive fusion, avoidance, and emotional distress. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the 2-factor solution, though a general good model fit was achieved only for the short G-CPAQ version. Structural equation modeling showed that PW and AE coupled with cognitive defusion partially mediated the influence of pain interference on pain severity, emotional distress, and avoidance of pain. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

慢性疼痛接受问卷(CPAQ)是一种衡量疼痛接受度的方法,包括疼痛意愿(PW)和活动参与度(AE;McCracken 等人,2004 年)。人们对 CPAQ 的因子结构存在担忧,因为目前尚不清楚 PW 和 AE 是否构成 2 个独立的结构,或者是 1 个疼痛接受结构。此外,该测量方法的测试分数解释的内部和预测有效性也存在担忧。本研究还表明,预测变量的选择导致了关于疼痛接受对疼痛相关调整的影响的理论混淆。本研究的目的是:(a)检验希腊慢性疼痛接受问卷(G-CPAQ)的长(20 项)和短(8 项)版本的心理测量特性;(b)使用验证性因子分析检验 2 因素解决方案在预测疼痛相关心理社会调整方面的效用;(c)探索疼痛接受和认知融合(包括对疼痛的“开放”反应方式)在疼痛干扰与疼痛相关结果之间的中介效应。160 名慢性疼痛患者完成了一份问卷包,其中包括疼痛指数、疼痛接受度、认知融合、回避和情绪困扰。验证性因子分析支持 2 因素解决方案,但仅短版 G-CPAQ 达到了良好的整体模型拟合度。结构方程模型表明,PW 和 AE 加上认知融合部分中介了疼痛干扰对疼痛严重程度、情绪困扰和回避疼痛的影响。

相似文献

1
Construct validity of the G-CPAQ and its mediating role in pain interference and adjustment.G-CPAQ 的建构效度及其在疼痛干扰和调整中的中介作用。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Feb;30(2):220-230. doi: 10.1037/pas0000467. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
2
Willing and able: a closer look at pain Willingness and Activity Engagement on the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8).愿意且能够:更深入地了解疼痛 在慢性疼痛接纳问卷(CPAQ-8)上的意愿和活动参与。
J Pain. 2013 Mar;14(3):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.004.
3
Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an Internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8.在互联网样本中验证慢性疼痛接纳问卷(CPAQ),并开发和初步验证 CPAQ-8。
Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):435-443. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
4
Validation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 in an Australian pain clinic sample.验证慢性疼痛接纳问卷-8 在澳大利亚疼痛诊所样本中的有效性。
Int J Behav Med. 2014 Feb;21(1):177-85. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9278-6.
5
Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and validity in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain.慢性疼痛接纳问卷:意大利慢性腰痛患者的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):E824-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182917299.
6
The Persian version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire.慢性疼痛接纳问卷的波斯语版本。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):350-8. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1769. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
7
Psychometric properties of the 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) in a Swedish chronic pain cohort.瑞典慢性疼痛队列中 8 项慢性疼痛接纳问卷(CPAQ-8)的心理测量特性。
J Rehabil Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):73-80. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1227.
8
Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ).芬兰文版慢性疼痛接纳问卷(CPAQ)的信度和效度研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Feb;35(4):306-14. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.694572. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
9
Pain Acceptance in Adolescents: Development of a Short Form of the CPAQ-A.青少年疼痛接纳度:CPAQA 短式量表的编制。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2019 May 1;44(4):453-462. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy090.
10
The Norwegian versions of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 - validation and reliability studies.慢性疼痛接纳问卷CPAQ - 20和CPAQ - 8的挪威语版本——效度和信度研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jul;39(14):1441-1448. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1198427. Epub 2016 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural correlates of pain acceptance and the role of the cerebellum: Functional connectivity and anatomical differences in individuals with headaches versus matched controls.疼痛接纳的神经关联及小脑的作用:头痛患者与匹配对照组在功能连接性和解剖结构上的差异
Eur J Pain. 2025 Mar;29(3):e4734. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4734. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
A network analysis of psychological flexibility, coping, and stigma in dermatology patients.皮肤病患者心理灵活性、应对方式和耻辱感的网络分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 16;10:1075672. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1075672. eCollection 2023.
3
Associations Between Six Core Processes of Psychological Flexibility and Functioning for Chronic Pain Patients: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis.
慢性疼痛患者心理灵活性的六个核心过程与功能之间的关联:一项三级荟萃分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 11;13:893150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.893150. eCollection 2022.