Khimani F, Kim J, Chen L, Dean E, Rizk V, Betts B, Nishihori T, Locke F, Mishra A, Perez L, Ayala E, Kharfan-Dabaja M, Nieder M, Fernandez H, Anasetti C, Pidala J
Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jul;52(7):1003-1009. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2017.63. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
Sirolimus (SIR)/tacrolimus (TAC) is an alternative to methotrexate (MTX)/TAC. However, rational selection among these GvHD prophylaxis approaches to optimize survival of individual patients is not possible based on current evidence. We compared SIR/TAC (n=293) to MTX/TAC (n=414). The primary objective was to identify unique predictors of overall survival (OS). Secondary objective was to compare acute and chronic GvHD, relapse, non-relapse mortality, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD/SOS), and acute kidney injury. Day 100 grades II-IV acute GvHD was significantly reduced in SIR/TAC vs MTX/TAC group (63 vs 73%, P=0.02). An interaction between GvHD prophylaxis groups and comorbidity index (hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-CI) significantly impacted OS. Patients with HCT-CI⩾4 had significantly worse OS with MTX/TAC (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.14-3.04, P=0.01) while no such effect was seen for SIR/TAC (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.26, P=0.31). Other end points did not significantly differ between groups except TMA and VOD/SOS were increased in the SIR/TAC group, but excess death from these complications was not observed. We conclude, GvHD prophylaxis approach of SIR/TAC is associated with reduced grades II-IV acute GvHD, comparable toxicity profile to MTX/TAC, and improved OS among patients with HCT-CI⩾4.
西罗莫司(SIR)/他克莫司(TAC)是甲氨蝶呤(MTX)/TAC的替代方案。然而,基于目前的证据,不可能在这些移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)预防方法中进行合理选择以优化个体患者的生存。我们将SIR/TAC组(n = 293)与MTX/TAC组(n = 414)进行了比较。主要目标是确定总生存(OS)的独特预测因素。次要目标是比较急性和慢性GvHD、复发、非复发死亡率、血栓性微血管病(TMA)、肝静脉闭塞病(VOD/SOS)和急性肾损伤。与MTX/TAC组相比,SIR/TAC组第100天II-IV级急性GvHD显著降低(63%对73%,P = 0.02)。GvHD预防组与合并症指数(造血细胞移植(HCT)-CI)之间的相互作用对OS有显著影响。HCT-CI⩾4的患者接受MTX/TAC时OS显著更差(风险比[HR] 1.86,95%置信区间[CI] 1.14 - 3.04,P = 0.01),而SIR/TAC组未观察到此类影响(HR 0.78,95% CI 0.48 - 1.26,P = 0.31)。除TMA和VOD/SOS在SIR/TAC组中增加外,其他终点在两组之间无显著差异,但未观察到这些并发症导致的额外死亡。我们得出结论,SIR/TAC的GvHD预防方法与降低II-IV级急性GvHD、与MTX/TAC相当的毒性谱以及改善HCT-CI⩾4患者的OS相关。