Chen Xiaoli, Sun Hengrui, Cassady Kaniel, Yang Shijie, Chen Ting, Wang Li, Yan Hongju, Zhang Xi, Feng Yimei
Medical Center of Hematology, The Xinqiao Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Irell and Manella Graduate School of Biological Sciences of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 9;11:683263. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.683263. eCollection 2021.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sirolimus (SRL) in the prevention of graft--host disease (GVHD) in recipients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the safety and efficacy of SRL-based prophylaxis regimens in patients receiving allo-HSCT were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database. Following specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, studies were selected and screened by two independent reviewers who subsequently extracted the study data. The Cochrane risk bias evaluation tool was used for quality evaluation, and RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis comparing the effects of SRL-based and non-SRL-based regimens on acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, overall survival (OS), relapse rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM), thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), and veno-occlusive disease (VOD).
Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a total sample size of 1,673 cases, including 778 cases of patients receiving SRL-based regimens and 895 cases in which patients received non-SRL-based regimens. Our data revealed that SRL containing prophylaxis can effectively reduce the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68∼0.82, < 0.0001). SRL-based prophylaxis was not associated with an improvement of grade III-IV acute GVHD (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.59∼1.03, = 0.08), chronic GVHD ( = 0.89), OS ( = 0.98), and relapse rate ( = 0.16). Despite its immunosuppressant effects, SRL-based regimens did not increase bacterial ( = 0.68), fungal ( = 0.70), or CMV ( = 0.10) infections. However, patients receiving SRL-based regimens had increased TMA ( < 0.00001) and VOD ( < 0.00001).
This meta-analysis indicates that addition of sirolimus is an effective alternative prophylaxis strategy for II-IV aGVHD but may cause endothelial cell injury and result in secondary TMA or VOD events.
本研究旨在评估西罗莫司(SRL)在预防异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)受者移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)中的安全性和有效性。
从PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中获取评估基于SRL的预防方案在接受allo-HSCT患者中的安全性和有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)。按照特定的纳入和排除标准,由两名独立的审阅者选择并筛选研究,随后提取研究数据。使用Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具进行质量评估,并使用RevMan 5.3软件进行统计分析,比较基于SRL和非基于SRL的方案对急性GVHD、慢性GVHD、总生存期(OS)、复发率、非复发死亡率(NRM)、血栓性微血管病(TMA)和肝静脉闭塞病(VOD)的影响。
本荟萃分析纳入了7项研究,总样本量为1673例,其中778例患者接受基于SRL的方案,895例患者接受非基于SRL的方案。我们的数据显示,含SRL的预防方案可有效降低II-IV级急性GVHD的发生率(RR = 0.75,95%CI:0.68∼0.82,P < 0.0001)。基于SRL的预防方案与III-IV级急性GVHD(RR = 0.78,95%CI:0.59∼1.03,P = 0.08)、慢性GVHD(P = 0.89)、OS(P = 0.98)和复发率(P = 0.16)的改善无关。尽管具有免疫抑制作用,但基于SRL的方案并未增加细菌(P = 0.68)、真菌(P = 0.70)或巨细胞病毒(P = 0.10)感染。然而,接受基于SRL方案的患者TMA(P < 0.00001)和VOD(P < 0.00001)有所增加。
本荟萃分析表明,添加西罗莫司是预防II-IV级急性GVHD的有效替代策略,但可能导致内皮细胞损伤并引发继发性TMA或VOD事件。