• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速部署主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉狭窄:150例患者的1年结局

Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: 1-year outcomes in 150 patients.

作者信息

Theron Alexis, Ravis Eleonore, Grisoli Dominique, Jaussaud Nicolas, Morera Pierre, Candolfi Pascal, Boleckova Jana, Lagier David, Amanatiou Cecile, Messous Lyna, Gariboldi Vlad, Collart Frederic

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.

Department of Biostatistics, Edwards Lifesciences, Nyon, Switzerland.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jul 1;25(1):68-74. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx050.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivx050
PMID:28369288
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS).

METHODS

All consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent RDAVR with the EDWARDS INTUITY bioprosthesis were prospectively included in a single-centre, cohort study between July 2012 and April 2015. Clinical examination and transthoracic echocardiography were performed preoperatively and at 1-month and 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

We included 150 patients: mean age 76.8 ± 6.2 years, 68.7% male and mean EuroSCORE II 3.4 ± 3.7%. Implantation was successful in all: 103 (68.7%) had isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 47 (31.3%) had concomitant procedures. For isolated AVR, mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 37.6 ± 13.3 and 59.9 ± 20.4 min, respectively. Overall, the 1-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 97.1% (95% confidence interval 92.4-98.9%). At 1 year, stroke occurred in 5 patients (3.34%), myocardial infarction in 1 (0.69%), endocarditis in 1 (0.69%), early explantation in 1 (0.67%), pacemaker implantation in 8 (5.6%) and Grade 2 periprosthetic regurgitation in 4 (3.2%; no grade 3 of 4). There were significant decreases from baseline ( P  < 0.001) in the proportion at New York Heart Association Class III/V (35.3-4.1%), mean gradient (54.9 ± 17.3 mmHg to 11.3 ± 4.8 mmHg) and mean left ventricular mass index (160.3 ± 44.8 g/m 2 to 118.5 ± 39.4 g/m 2 ). Mean indexed effective orifice area at 1 year was 1.02 ± 0.37 cm 2 /m 2 . Ten patients (6.6%) had severe patient-prosthesis mismatch.

CONCLUSIONS

RDAVR for severe AS provided favourable outcomes over 1 year.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估快速部署主动脉瓣置换术(RDAVR)治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的安全性和有效性。

方法

2012年7月至2015年4月期间,所有连续接受EDWARDS INTUITY生物瓣膜进行RDAVR的重度AS患者均前瞻性纳入一项单中心队列研究。术前、术后1个月及1年进行临床检查和经胸超声心动图检查。

结果

共纳入150例患者,平均年龄76.8±6.2岁,男性占68.7%,平均欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)II评分为3.4±3.7%。所有患者植入均成功,其中103例(68.7%)接受单纯主动脉瓣置换术(AVR),47例(31.3%)接受同期手术。对于单纯AVR,平均主动脉阻断时间和体外循环时间分别为37.6±13.3分钟和59.9±20.4分钟。总体而言,1年的Kaplan-Meier生存率为97.1%(95%置信区间92.4 - 98.9%)。1年时,5例(3.34%)发生卒中,1例(0.69%)发生心肌梗死,1例(0.69%)发生心内膜炎,1例(0.67%)早期瓣膜置换,8例(5.6%)植入起搏器,4例(3.2%)发生2级人工瓣膜反流(无3或4级)。纽约心脏协会心功能分级III/IV级患者比例(35.3% - 4.1%)、平均跨瓣压差(54.9±17.3 mmHg降至11.3±4.8 mmHg)和平均左心室质量指数(160.3±44.8 g/m²降至118.5±39.4 g/m²)较基线均显著降低(P < 0.001)。1年时平均指数化有效瓣口面积为1.02±0.37 cm²/m²。10例(6.6%)患者存在严重的人工瓣膜-患者不匹配。

结论

重度AS患者行RDAVR术后1年预后良好。

相似文献

1
Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: 1-year outcomes in 150 patients.快速部署主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉狭窄:150例患者的1年结局
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jul 1;25(1):68-74. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx050.
2
Early Outcomes with Rapid-deployment vs Stented Biological Valves: A Propensity-match Analysis.快速部署生物瓣膜与带支架生物瓣膜的早期结果:倾向匹配分析
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Spring;30(1):16-23. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
3
TRANSFORM (Multicenter Experience With Rapid Deployment Edwards INTUITY Valve System for Aortic Valve Replacement) US clinical trial: Performance of a rapid deployment aortic valve.TRANSFORM(Edwards INTUITY 快速部署瓣膜系统在主动脉瓣置换中的多中心应用经验)美国临床试验:快速部署主动脉瓣的性能。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Feb;153(2):241-251.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.062. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
4
Rapid Deployment of Aortic Bioprosthesis in Elderly Patients With Small Aortic Annulus.主动脉瓣环小的老年患者主动脉生物瓣的快速植入
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
5
Haemodynamic benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: 1-year results of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.经微创途径快速植入主动脉瓣置换术的血流动力学益处:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验的1年结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Oct;50(4):713-720. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw042. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
6
Outcomes of a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Versus Its Conventional Counterpart: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.快速部署主动脉瓣与其传统对应物的比较结果:一项倾向匹配分析。
Innovations (Phila). 2018 May/Jun;13(3):177-183. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000509.
7
One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.TRITON 试验:新一代外科主动脉瓣治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的一年结果:采用 EDWARDS INTUITY 瓣膜系统行快速部署主动脉瓣置换术的前瞻性多中心研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):110-5; discussion 115-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.108. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
8
Conventional versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a single-centre comparison between the Edwards Magna valve and its rapid-deployment successor.传统主动脉瓣置换术与快速部署主动脉瓣置换术:爱德华兹麦格纳瓣膜与其快速部署后继产品的单中心比较
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;22(6):799-805. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw052. Epub 2016 Mar 13.
9
Intermediate-term outcome of 500 consecutive rapid-deployment surgical aortic valve procedures†.500 例连续快速部署外科主动脉瓣手术的中期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar 1;55(3):527-533. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy273.
10
Aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch and long-term outcomes: 19-year single-center experience.主动脉瓣置换术后患者不匹配与长期预后:19 年单中心经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):844-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.075. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Reverse left ventricular remodeling after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄后左心室逆向重构:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 4;11:1407566. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1407566. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of transcatheter and sutureless aortic bioprostheses: how to make the right choice in intermediate risk patients.经导管与无缝合主动脉生物瓣膜的血流动力学及临床结果比较:如何在中危患者中做出正确选择
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep;6(5):510-515. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.09.04.