Luepnitz Deborah Anna
4247 Locust St. Suite # 817, Philadelphia, PA, 19104.
Int J Psychoanal. 2017 Apr;98(2):343-370. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12639.
On the 40th anniversary of its publication, the author re-reads Winnicott's The Piggle - a case of 'on demand analysis' with a child suffering from psychotic night terrors - in light of new information about the patient. Conversations between the author and 'Gabrielle' explore two areas not regarded as priorities by Winnicott: the transgenerational transmission of pathology/trauma, and the ways that language, in general - and given names, in particular - organize individual subjectivity. The question raised is to what degree Winnicott - who described the treatment as "psychoanalysis partagé [shared]" due to the parents' involvement - thought of the pathology itself as 'shared.' The goal is not to supplant but to expand Winnicott's understanding of the case, borrowing insights from the work of Lacan and others.
在《小猪》出版40周年之际，作者根据关于该患者的新信息，重新阅读了温尼科特的《小猪》——一个对患有精神病性夜惊症儿童的“按需分析”案例。作者与“加布里埃尔”之间的对话探讨了两个温尼科特未视为优先事项的领域：病理/创伤的代际传递，以及一般意义上的语言，尤其是名字，构建个体主体性的方式。提出的问题是，由于父母的参与，温尼科特将这种治疗描述为“共享精神分析”，他在何种程度上认为病理本身是“共享的”。目标不是取代，而是扩展温尼科特对该案例的理解，借鉴拉康等人作品中的见解。
