Lenormand Marie
Laboratoire de rattachement: LPCPP, EA3278 "Laboratoire de Psychologie Clinique, de Psychopathologie et de Psychanalyse," Aix-Marseille Université, UFR ALLSH, Aix en Provence, France.
Int J Psychoanal. 2018 Oct;99(5):1107-1128. doi: 10.1080/00207578.2018.1489709.
Forty years after its publication in 1977, has recently provoked new interest among researchers. Most notably, the real "Gabrielle" has shared her story with D. Luepnitz and the analytical community. Joining in this vibrant discussion, this paper aims at shedding new light on the case by focusing on as a "set-up," namely on the heterogenous ensemble of discursive and non-discursive elements which determined the analytical process. This reconsideration, although grounded in a Lacanian framework, supposes opening a dialogue between the French and English-speaking literature on the case. Three issues are at stake. First the paper intends to uncover the logic at work in the cure, studying it from the perspective of the analyst and the child, but also from that of the parents. Second, this triple focus is key to a reconsideration of the set-up of psychoanalysis with children more generally-in so far as it questions the function of infantile neurosis and what Winnicott calls "psychoanalysis ." Third, it will look at the powerful effects of co-writing and co-publishing with the parents-considered as part of the set-up itself rather than exterior to the process of the cure-on the analytical outcome.
1977年出版的这本书在四十年后，最近引发了研究人员的新兴趣。最值得注意的是，真正的“加布里埃尔”与D. 卢埃普尼茨及分析学界分享了她的故事。参与这场热烈的讨论，本文旨在通过将其视为一个“设置”，即关注决定分析过程的话语和非话语元素的异质集合，来为该案例提供新的视角。这种重新审视虽然基于拉康的框架，但设想在法语和英语关于该案例的文献之间展开对话。有三个问题至关重要。首先，本文旨在揭示治疗中起作用的逻辑，从分析师、孩子以及父母的角度对其进行研究。其次，这种三重关注对于更广泛地重新思考儿童精神分析的设置至关重要——因为它质疑婴儿神经症的功能以及温尼科特所称的“精神分析”。第三，它将审视与父母共同撰写和共同发表——被视为设置本身的一部分而非治疗过程之外的因素——对分析结果产生的强大影响。
