Vijver Martina G, Hunting Ellard R, Nederstigt Tom A P, Tamis Wil L M, van den Brink Paul J, van Bodegom Peter M
Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Apr;36(4):860-865. doi: 10.1002/etc.3721.
Current admission policies for pesticides follow a controlled experimental tiered risk assessment approach, giving results that are difficult to extrapolate to a real-world situation. Later analyses of compounds such as DDT and neonicotinoid pesticides clearly show that the actual chemical impacts frequently affect many more components of an ecosystem than a priori suggested by risk assessment. Therefore, to manage the actual risks for ecosystems imposed by manufactured compounds, it is proposed that current admission policies for chemicals be enriched by using postregistration monitoring. Such monitoring is essential to identify unexpected direct and indirect impacts on organisms by accounting for multiple propagation routes and exposures. Implementation of postregistration monitoring could build on existing monitoring networks. This approach would tackle the current policy impasse of compartment-based regulations versus exposure-based regulations, and, more importantly, would provide a safety lock for risk assessment across compartments and more likely ensure the protection of our natural environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:860-865. © 2017 SETAC.
目前的农药准入政策采用了一种受控实验的分层风险评估方法,得出的结果难以外推至实际情况。后来对滴滴涕和新烟碱类农药等化合物的分析清楚地表明,实际的化学影响对生态系统许多组成部分的影响往往比风险评估事先建议的要多。因此,为管理人造化合物对生态系统造成的实际风险,建议通过使用注册后监测来丰富当前的化学品准入政策。这种监测对于通过考虑多种传播途径和暴露情况来识别对生物体的意外直接和间接影响至关重要。注册后监测的实施可以建立在现有监测网络的基础上。这种方法将解决当前基于隔室的法规与基于暴露的法规之间的政策僵局,更重要的是,将为跨隔室的风险评估提供一个安全保障,并更有可能确保对我们自然环境的保护。《环境毒理学与化学》2017年;36:860 - 865。© 2017 SETAC。