Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):41-47. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26691. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
The most common γ-aminobutyric-acid (GABA) editing approach, MEGA-PRESS, uses J-editing to measure GABA distinct from larger overlapping metabolites, but suffers contamination from coedited macromolecules (MMs) comprising 40 to 60% of the observed signal. MEGA-SPECIAL is an alternative method with better MM suppression, but is not widely used primarily because of its relatively poor spatial localization. Our goal was to develop an improved MM-suppressed GABA editing sequence at 3 Tesla.
We modified a single-voxel MEGA-SPECIAL sequence with an oscillating readout gradient for improved spatial localization, and used very selective 30-ms editing pulses for improved suppression of coedited MMs.
Simulation and in vivo experiments confirmed excellent MM suppression, insensitive to the range of B frequency drifts typically encountered in vivo. Both intersubject and intrasubject studies showed that MMs, when suppressed by the improved MEGA-SPECIAL method, contributed approximately 40% to the corresponding MEGA-PRESS measurements. From the intersubject study, the coefficient of variation for GABA+/Cre (MEGA-PRESS) was 11.2% versus 7% for GABA/Cre (improved MEGA-SPECIAL), demonstrating significantly reduced variance (P = 0.005), likely coming from coedited MMs.
This improved MEGA-SPECIAL sequence provides unbiased GABA measurements with reduced variance as compared with conventional MEGA-PRESS. This approach is also relatively insensitive to the range of B drifts typically observed in in vivo human studies. Magn Reson Med 79:41-47, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
最常见的γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)编辑方法 MEGA-PRESS 使用 J 编辑来测量与较大重叠代谢物不同的 GABA,但会受到包含 40%至 60%观察信号的共编辑大分子(MM)的污染。MEGA-SPECIAL 是一种替代方法,具有更好的 MM 抑制作用,但由于其相对较差的空间定位,尚未得到广泛应用。我们的目标是在 3 Tesla 下开发一种改进的 MM 抑制 GABA 编辑序列。
我们用振荡读出梯度修改了单体素 MEGA-SPECIAL 序列,以提高空间定位,并使用非常选择性的 30-ms 编辑脉冲来提高共编辑 MM 的抑制效果。
模拟和体内实验证实了出色的 MM 抑制作用,对体内通常遇到的 B 频率漂移范围不敏感。受试者间和受试者内研究均表明,当使用改进的 MEGA-SPECIAL 方法抑制 MM 时,MM 对相应的 MEGA-PRESS 测量值的贡献约为 40%。从受试者间研究来看,MEGA-PRESS(GABA+/Cre)的变异系数为 11.2%,而改进的 MEGA-SPECIAL(GABA/Cre)为 7%,表明方差显著降低(P=0.005),这可能来自共编辑 MM。
与传统的 MEGA-PRESS 相比,这种改进的 MEGA-SPECIAL 序列提供了具有较低方差的无偏 GABA 测量值。这种方法对体内人类研究中通常观察到的 B 漂移范围也相对不敏感。磁共振医学 79:41-47,2018。© 2017 国际磁共振学会。