Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon I University, Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Lyon, France.
Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Oct;29(10):1-15. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13067. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
BACKGROUND: An international group of experts evaluated and revised recommendations for ambulatory reflux monitoring for the diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Literature search was focused on indications and technical recommendations for GERD testing and phenotypes definitions. Statements were proposed and discussed during several structured meetings. KEY RESULTS: Reflux testing should be performed after cessation of acid suppressive medication in patients with a low likelihood of GERD. In this setting, testing can be either catheter-based or wireless pH-monitoring or pH-impedance monitoring. In patients with a high probability of GERD (esophagitis grade C and D, histology proven Barrett's mucosa >1 cm, peptic stricture, previous positive pH monitoring) and persistent symptoms, pH-impedance monitoring should be performed on treatment. Recommendations are provided for data acquisition and analysis. Esophageal acid exposure is considered as pathological if acid exposure time (AET) is greater than 6% on pH testing. Number of reflux episodes and baseline impedance are exploratory metrics that may complement AET. Positive symptom reflux association is defined as symptom index (SI) >50% or symptom association probability (SAP) >95%. A positive symptom-reflux association in the absence of pathological AET defines hypersensitivity to reflux. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The consensus group determined that grade C or D esophagitis, peptic stricture, histology proven Barrett's mucosa >1 cm, and esophageal acid exposure greater >6% are sufficient to define pathological GERD. Further testing should be considered when none of these criteria are fulfilled.
背景:一个国际专家组对用于诊断胃食管反流病(GERD)的门诊反流监测建议进行了评估和修订。
方法:文献检索主要集中在 GERD 测试的适应证和技术建议以及表型定义上。通过多次结构化会议提出和讨论了陈述。
主要结果:在 GERD 可能性低的患者中停止抑酸药物治疗后,应进行反流测试。在这种情况下,测试可以是基于导管的或无线 pH 监测或 pH 阻抗监测。对于 GERD 可能性高的患者(食管炎 C 和 D 级、组织学证实的 Barrett 黏膜>1cm、消化性狭窄、以前的 pH 监测阳性)和持续症状,应在治疗时进行 pH 阻抗监测。为数据采集和分析提供了建议。如果 pH 测试中酸暴露时间(AET)大于 6%,则认为食管酸暴露是病理性的。反流发作次数和基线阻抗是可能补充 AET 的探索性指标。阳性症状反流关联定义为症状指数(SI)>50%或症状关联概率(SAP)>95%。在不存在病理性 AET 的情况下,阳性症状-反流关联定义为对反流的敏感性增加。
结论和推论:共识小组确定 C 或 D 级食管炎、消化性狭窄、组织学证实的 Barrett 黏膜>1cm 和食管酸暴露>6%足以定义病理性 GERD。当这些标准都不满足时,应考虑进一步测试。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024-3
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021-4
Gut. 2018-2-3
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019-10-9
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022-10
World J Gastroenterol. 2012-8-28
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021-4
World J Methodol. 2025-12-20
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025-7-30
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2025-7
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025-4-30