Li Xiaojuan, Kshirsagar Abhijit V, Brookhart M Alan
Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
UNC Kidney Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Hemodial Int. 2017 Jun;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S93-S103. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12558. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
Among end-stage renal disease patients maintained by hemodialysis, anemia has been managed primarily through erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and intravenous (IV) iron. Following concerns about the cardiovascular (CV) safety of ESAs and changes in the reimbursement policies in Medicare's ESRD program, the use of IV iron has increased. IV iron supplementation promotes hemoglobin production and reduces ESA requirements, yet there exists relatively little evidence on the long-term safety of iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients. Labile iron can induce oxidative stress and is also essential in bacterial growth, leading to concerns about IV iron use and risk of CV events and infections in hemodialysis patients. Existing randomized controlled trials provide little evidence about safety due to insufficient power and short follow-up; recent observational studies have been inconsistent, but some have associated iron exposure with increased risk of infections and CV events. Given the widespread use and potential safety concerns related to IV iron, well-designed large prospective studies are needed to assess to identify optimal strategies for iron administration that maximize its benefits while avoiding potential risks.
在接受血液透析维持治疗的终末期肾病患者中,贫血主要通过促红细胞生成素(ESAs)和静脉注射铁剂进行治疗。随着对ESAs心血管(CV)安全性的担忧以及医疗保险终末期肾病项目报销政策的变化,静脉注射铁剂的使用有所增加。静脉补充铁剂可促进血红蛋白生成并减少对ESAs的需求,但关于血液透析患者补充铁剂的长期安全性的证据相对较少。不稳定铁可诱导氧化应激,并且在细菌生长中也必不可少,这引发了对血液透析患者使用静脉注射铁剂以及发生心血管事件和感染风险的担忧。现有的随机对照试验由于样本量不足和随访时间短,几乎没有提供关于安全性的证据;最近的观察性研究结果并不一致,但一些研究将铁暴露与感染和心血管事件风险增加联系起来。鉴于静脉注射铁剂的广泛使用以及与之相关的潜在安全问题,需要设计良好的大型前瞻性研究来评估并确定最佳的铁剂给药策略,以在避免潜在风险的同时最大化其益处。