Del Vecchio Lucia, Longhi Selena, Locatelli Francesco
Department of Nephrology and Dialysis , A. Manzoni Hospital , Lecco , Italy.
Clin Kidney J. 2016 Apr;9(2):260-7. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv142. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
Anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is managed primarily with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron therapy. Following concerns around ESA therapy, intravenous (IV) iron is being administered more and more worldwide. However, it is still unclear whether this approach is safe at very high doses or in the presence of very high ferritin levels. Some observational studies have shown a relationship between either high ferritin level or high iron dose and increased risk of death, cardiovascular events, hospitalization or infection. Others have not been able to confirm these findings. However, they suffer from indication biases. On the other hand, the majority of randomized clinical trials have only a very short follow-up (and thus drug exposure) and are inadequate to assess the mortality risk. None of them have tested the role of different iron doses on hard end points. With the lack of clear evidence coming from well-designed and large-scale studies, several data suggest that excessive iron therapy may be toxic in several aspects, ranging from iron overload to tissue damage from labile iron. A number of experimental and clinical data suggest that either excessive iron therapy or iron overload may be a possible culprit of atherogenesis. The process seems to be mediated by oxidative stress. Iron therapy should also be used cautiously in the presence of active infections, since iron is essential for bacterial growth. Recently, the European Medicines Agency officially raised concerns about rare hypersensitivity reactions following IV iron administration. The balance has been in favour of benefits. In several European countries, this has created a lot of confusion and somewhat slowed the run towards excessive use. Altogether, IV iron remains a mainstay of anaemia treatment in CKD patients. However, in our opinion, its excessive use should be avoided, especially in patients with high ferritin levels and when ESA agents are not contraindicated.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)中的贫血主要通过促红细胞生成素(ESA)和铁剂治疗来处理。在对ESA治疗产生担忧之后,静脉注射铁剂在全球范围内的使用越来越多。然而,目前仍不清楚这种方法在极高剂量或铁蛋白水平极高的情况下是否安全。一些观察性研究表明,高铁蛋白水平或高剂量铁与死亡、心血管事件、住院或感染风险增加之间存在关联。其他研究则未能证实这些发现。然而,这些研究存在指征偏倚。另一方面,大多数随机临床试验的随访时间(以及因此的药物暴露时间)非常短,不足以评估死亡风险。它们中没有一项测试过不同铁剂量对硬性终点的作用。由于缺乏来自精心设计的大规模研究的明确证据,一些数据表明,过度的铁剂治疗可能在多个方面具有毒性,从铁过载到不稳定铁导致的组织损伤。许多实验和临床数据表明,过度的铁剂治疗或铁过载可能是动脉粥样硬化形成的一个可能原因。这个过程似乎是由氧化应激介导的。在存在活动性感染的情况下,铁剂治疗也应谨慎使用,因为铁是细菌生长所必需的。最近,欧洲药品管理局正式对静脉注射铁剂后罕见的过敏反应表示担忧。目前权衡的结果是利大于弊。在几个欧洲国家,这引发了很多困惑,并在一定程度上减缓了过度使用的趋势。总体而言,静脉注射铁剂仍然是CKD患者贫血治疗的主要手段。然而,我们认为,应避免过度使用,尤其是在铁蛋白水平高且ESA制剂无禁忌证的患者中。