Peter C. Rockers is an assistant professor of global health in the Department of Global Health at the Boston University School of Public Health, in Massachusetts.
Veronika J. Wirtz (
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):706-713. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1213.
Global biopharmaceutical companies are increasingly establishing access-to-medicines (AtM) initiatives in low- and middle-income countries. We reviewed the initiatives of twenty-one research-based global biopharmaceutical companies to assess their strategies for improving access and the quality of evidence on the impact of their initiatives. The number of operating initiatives increased from 17 in 2000 to 102 in 2015. Of the 120 different AtM initiatives identified, 48 percent used a medicine donation strategy, and 44 percent used a price reduction strategy. While companies have frequently claimed that their initiatives have had positive impacts, we found published evaluations for only seven initiatives, and nearly all of the evaluations were of low (62 percent) or very low (32 percent) quality. It is clear that the biopharmaceutical industry has increased its commitment to improving access to medicines in low- and middle-income countries. However, companies should do more to generate high-quality evidence on their initiatives, and the global health community should do more to assist the developing of evidence about the initiatives.
全球生物制药公司越来越多地在中低收入国家设立获取药品(AtM)计划。我们审查了 21 家基于研究的全球生物制药公司的计划,以评估其改善获取途径的策略和其计划对影响的证据质量。运营计划的数量从 2000 年的 17 个增加到 2015 年的 102 个。在确定的 120 种不同的获取药品计划中,48%采用药品捐赠策略,44%采用降低价格策略。虽然公司经常声称其计划产生了积极影响,但我们仅找到了 7 项计划的已发表评估,而且几乎所有评估的质量都较低(62%)或非常低(32%)。显然,生物制药行业已增加其在中低收入国家改善药品获取的承诺。但是,公司应做更多工作来生成有关其计划的高质量证据,全球卫生界也应做更多工作来协助制定有关这些计划的证据。