Yang Lin, Hipp J Aaron, Lee Jung Ae, Tabak Rachel G, Dodson Elizabeth A, Marx Christine M, Brownson Ross C
Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Mar 22;6:197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.03.008. eCollection 2017 Jun.
The worksite serves as an ideal setting to reduce sedentary time. Yet little research has focused on occupational sitting, and few have considered factors beyond the personal or socio-demographic level. The current study i) examined variation in occupational sitting across different occupations, ii) explored whether worksite level factors (e.g., employer size, worksite supports and policies) may be associated with occupational sitting. Between 2012 and 2013, participants residing in four Missouri metropolitan areas were interviewed via telephone and provided information on socio-demographic characteristics, schedule flexibility, occupation, work related factors, and worksite supports and policies. Occupational sitting was self-reported (daily minutes spent sitting at work), and dichotomized. Occupation-stratified analyses were conducted to identify correlates of occupational sitting using multiple logistic regressions. A total of 1668 participants provided completed data. Those employed in business and office/administrative support spent more daily occupational sitting time (median 330 min) compared to service and blue collar employees (median 30 min). Few worksite supports and policies were sitting specific, yet factors such as having a full-time job, larger employer size, schedule flexibility, and stair prompt signage were associated with occupational sitting. For example, larger employer size was associated with higher occupational sitting in health care, education/professional, and service occupations. Work-related factors, worksite supports and policies are associated with occupational sitting. The pattern of association varies among different occupation groups. This exploratory work adds to the body of research on worksite level correlates of occupational sitting. This may provide information on priority venues for targeting highly sedentary occupation groups.
工作场所是减少久坐时间的理想环境。然而,很少有研究关注职业性久坐,并且几乎没有人考虑过个人或社会人口层面以外的因素。本研究:i)调查了不同职业间职业性久坐的差异;ii)探讨了工作场所层面的因素(如雇主规模、工作场所支持和政策)是否可能与职业性久坐相关。2012年至2013年期间,通过电话采访了居住在密苏里州四个大都市地区的参与者,并收集了有关社会人口特征、日程灵活性、职业、工作相关因素以及工作场所支持和政策的信息。职业性久坐情况由参与者自我报告(每天工作时坐着的分钟数),并进行二分法分类。采用多因素logistic回归进行职业分层分析,以确定职业性久坐的相关因素。共有1668名参与者提供了完整数据。与服务和蓝领员工(中位数30分钟)相比,从事商业和办公室/行政支持工作的人员每天职业性久坐时间更长(中位数330分钟)。很少有工作场所支持和政策是专门针对久坐的,但诸如全职工作、雇主规模较大、日程灵活性以及楼梯提示标识等因素与职业性久坐有关。例如,在医疗保健、教育/专业和服务职业中,雇主规模较大与职业性久坐时间较长有关。工作相关因素、工作场所支持和政策与职业性久坐有关。不同职业群体之间的关联模式各不相同。这项探索性工作增加了关于工作场所层面职业性久坐相关因素的研究。这可能为针对久坐程度高的职业群体确定优先干预场所提供信息。