The Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 9;15(6):1214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061214.
Habitual behaviours are learned responses that are triggered automatically by associated environmental cues. The unvarying nature of most workplace settings makes workplace physical activity a prime candidate for a habitual behaviour, yet the role of habit strength in occupational physical activity has not been investigated. Aims of the present study were to: (i) document occupational physical activity habit strength; and (ii) investigate associations between occupational activity habit strength and occupational physical activity levels. A sample of UK office-based workers ( = 116; 53% female, median age 40 years, SD 10.52) was fitted with activPAL accelerometers worn for 24 h on five consecutive days, providing an objective measure of occupational step counts, stepping time, sitting time, standing time and sit-to-stand transitions. A self-report index measured the automaticity of two occupational physical activities (“being active” (e.g., walking to printers and coffee machines) and “stair climbing”). Adjusted linear regression models investigated the association between occupational activity habit strength and objectively-measured occupational step counts, stepping time, sitting time, standing time and sit-to-stand transitions. Eighty-one per cent of the sample reported habits for “being active”, and 62% reported habits for “stair climbing”. In adjusted models, reported habit strength for “being active” were positively associated with average occupational sit-to-stand transitions per hour (B = 0.340, 95% CI: 0.053 to 0.627, = 0.021). “Stair climbing” habit strength was unexpectedly negatively associated with average hourly stepping time (B = −0.01, 95% CI: −0.01 to −0.00, = 0.006) and average hourly occupational step count (B = −38.34, 95% CI: −72.81 to −3.88, = 0.030), which may reflect that people with stronger stair-climbing habits compensate by walking fewer steps overall. Results suggest that stair-climbing and office-based occupational activity can be habitual. Interventions might fruitfully promote habitual workplace activity, although, in light of potential compensation effects, such interventions should perhaps focus on promoting moderate-intensity activity.
习惯性行为是由相关环境线索自动触发的习得反应。大多数工作场所环境的不变性质使得工作场所身体活动成为习惯性行为的主要候选者,但习惯强度在职业身体活动中的作用尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是:(i)记录职业身体活动习惯强度;(ii)调查职业活动习惯强度与职业身体活动水平之间的关系。对英国办公室工作人员的样本(n=116;53%为女性,平均年龄 40 岁,标准差 10.52)进行了 24 小时连续 5 天的佩戴 activPAL 加速度计的测试,提供了职业步骤计数、踏步时间、坐姿时间、站立时间和坐站转换的客观测量。自我报告指数测量了两种职业身体活动的自动性(“积极活动”(例如,走到打印机和咖啡机旁)和“爬楼梯”)。调整后的线性回归模型调查了职业活动习惯强度与客观测量的职业步骤计数、踏步时间、坐姿时间、站立时间和坐站转换之间的关系。81%的样本报告了“积极活动”的习惯,62%的样本报告了“爬楼梯”的习惯。在调整后的模型中,报告的“积极活动”习惯强度与每小时平均职业坐站转换次数呈正相关(B=0.340,95%置信区间:0.053 至 0.627,=0.021)。“爬楼梯”习惯强度与每小时平均踏步时间呈意外负相关(B=−0.01,95%置信区间:−0.01 至−0.00,=0.006)和每小时平均职业步骤计数呈负相关(B=−38.34,95%置信区间:−72.81 至−3.88,=0.030),这可能反映出具有更强爬楼梯习惯的人通过总体减少走步来进行补偿。结果表明,爬楼梯和基于办公室的职业活动可能是习惯性的。干预措施可能会成功促进习惯性的工作场所活动,但是,鉴于潜在的补偿效应,此类干预措施可能应该侧重于促进中等强度的活动。