• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助食管旁疝修补术:单中心经验及系统评价

Robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a single-center experience and systematic review.

作者信息

Vasudevan Vanitha, Reusche Ryan, Nelson Erek, Kaza Srinivas

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Palm Beach Regional Campus, 5301 S congress Ave, Atlantis, FL, 33462, USA.

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st st SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):81-86. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0697-x. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-017-0697-x
PMID:28374223
Abstract

Robotic Surgery is becoming increasingly used in general surgery. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and short-term (less than 1 year) outcomes of Robotic Paraesophageal Hernia (RPEH) Surgery using the DaVinci Surgical Robot system (Intuitive Surgical, CA) in a large community hospital. This is a retrospective cohort study of 28 consecutive patients who underwent robotic paraesophageal hernia repair January 2011-March 2013 in this institution. Data and outcomes collected for analysis include patient demographics, operating times, conversion, complications, mortality and recurrence. The mean age of the patients was 68.7 +/- 12.7 years, 82% were females and the mean BMI was 29 +/- 6.3. The mean operative time, including the robot docking time, was 83.6 + 24 min. The average length of hospital stay (LOS) was 2.8 +/- 1.9 days. There were no conversions to open or laparoscopic procedures. Postoperative complications were noted in 3 patients (10.7%), including one mortality (3.4%). One symptomatic recurrence (3.4%) was noted during the 12-month follow-up period. Robotic Paraesophageal repair is a safe (similar rate of complication and mortality to literature for laparoscopic procedure) and an effective (paraeshopageal hernia repaired without high recurrence) procedure with acceptable complication rates even in older patients with high operative risks.

摘要

机器人手术在普通外科中的应用越来越广泛。本研究的目的是在一家大型社区医院中,评估使用达芬奇手术机器人系统(直观外科公司,加利福尼亚州)进行机器人经食管裂孔疝修补术(RPEH)的安全性、有效性和短期(少于1年)疗效。这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2011年1月至2013年3月在该机构接受机器人经食管裂孔疝修补术的28例连续患者。收集用于分析的数据和结果包括患者人口统计学资料、手术时间、中转情况、并发症、死亡率和复发情况。患者的平均年龄为68.7±12.7岁,82%为女性,平均体重指数为29±6.3。平均手术时间,包括机器人对接时间,为83.6±24分钟。平均住院时间(LOS)为2.8±1.9天。没有转为开放手术或腹腔镜手术的情况。3例患者(10.7%)出现术后并发症,包括1例死亡(3.4%)。在12个月的随访期内,发现1例有症状的复发(3.4%)。机器人经食管裂孔疝修补术是一种安全的手术(并发症和死亡率与腹腔镜手术的文献报道相似),也是一种有效的手术(经食管裂孔疝修补后复发率低),即使在手术风险高的老年患者中,并发症发生率也可接受。

相似文献

1
Robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a single-center experience and systematic review.机器人辅助食管旁疝修补术:单中心经验及系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):81-86. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0697-x. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
2
Senhance versus da Vinci robotic inguinal hernia repair: a multi-center propensity-weighted study.Senhance与达芬奇机器人腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项多中心倾向加权研究。
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):174. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03364-1.
3
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
4
Treatment of paraesophageal hiatal hernia in octogenarians: a systematic review and retrospective cohort study.八旬老人食管旁裂孔疝的治疗:一项系统评价和回顾性队列研究
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Jul 1;31(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy010.
5
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
6
Robotic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人腹股沟疝修补术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Nov;91(11):2277-2287. doi: 10.1111/ans.16505. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
8
Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的临床及患者报告结局
JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00005. Epub 2025 May 7.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术比较:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):775-781. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01312-6. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
10
Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.老年患者开放与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):179. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03368-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Fundoplication Revision of a Recurrent Large Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia in a 63-Year-Old Female.一名63岁女性复发性巨大食管旁裂孔疝的胃底折叠术翻修术
Cureus. 2025 Jul 1;17(7):e87119. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87119. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Body mass index should be considered as an indicator for laparoscopic surgery or robot-assisted surgery selection in patients with hiatal hernia.体重指数应被视为食管裂孔疝患者选择腹腔镜手术或机器人辅助手术的一个指标。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):3991-4004. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2128. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
3
Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Concurrent Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Obese Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助结直肠手术的临床结果及成本效益分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5490-5493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4910-1. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
2
Robotic-Assisted Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Initial Experience at a Single Institution.机器人辅助食管旁疝修补术:单机构的初步经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Apr;26(4):290-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0096. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study.
肥胖患者同期行原发性Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与食管旁疝修补术
JSLS. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00062. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
4
Voluminous hiatal hernias - the role of robotic surgery.巨大食管裂孔疝——机器人手术的作用
Innov Surg Sci. 2024 Jul 26;10(1):43-49. doi: 10.1515/iss-2023-0033. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Robotic surgery for giant paraesophageal hernias: a promising approach to improved outcomes.机器人手术治疗巨大食管旁疝:一种有望改善治疗效果的方法。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 27;19(1):83. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02247-y.
6
Current Trends in the Management of Hiatal Hernia: A Literature Review of 10 Years of Data.食管裂孔疝管理的当前趋势:十年数据的文献综述
Cureus. 2024 Oct 20;16(10):e71921. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71921. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Adoption of the Robotic Platform across Thoracic Surgeries.机器人平台在胸外科手术中的应用。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 27;13(19):5764. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195764.
8
Retrospective cost analysis of robotic and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜抗反流手术及食管旁疝修补术的回顾性成本分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7179-7186. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11294-9. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
9
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝的有效性和安全性的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 26;19(2):e0298989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298989. eCollection 2024.
10
BRAZILIAN HERNIA AND ABDOMINAL WALL SOCIETY STATEMENT ON LARGE HIATAL HERNIAS MANAGEMENT.巴西疝与腹壁外科学会关于大型食管裂孔疝管理的声明。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Feb 5;36:e1787. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020230069e1787. eCollection 2024.
传统腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜再次食管裂孔疝修补及抗反流手术的评估:一项队列研究
J Robot Surg. 2016 Mar;10(1):33-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0558-z. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
4
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: current controversies.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术:当前的争议
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Oct;23(5):442-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a12680.
5
250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility.250 例机器人胰腺切除术:安全性和可行性。
Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):554-9; discussion 559-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4e87c.
6
Urgent laparoscopic repair of acutely symptomatic PEH is safe and effective.对急性有症状的原发性食管裂孔疝进行紧急腹腔镜修复是安全有效的。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4081-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3064-7. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
7
Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress.经验丰富的外科医生行机器人与腹腔镜胃癌手术:手术、并发症和手术应激的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1258-65. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2679-6. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
8
Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair--a case-control study.机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补术——一项病例对照研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Jun;398(5):691-6. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0982-0. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
9
Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes.仅行复苏等待:急性表现的食管裂孔疝行早期手术可获得更好的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):267-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2436-8. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
10
Comparative analysis of diaphragmatic hernia repair outcomes using the nationwide inpatient sample database.使用全国住院患者样本数据库对膈疝修复结果进行比较分析。
Arch Surg. 2012 Jul;147(7):607-12. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.127.