Suppr超能文献

对急性有症状的原发性食管裂孔疝进行紧急腹腔镜修复是安全有效的。

Urgent laparoscopic repair of acutely symptomatic PEH is safe and effective.

作者信息

Parker David M, Rambhajan Amrit, Johanson Katherine, Ibele Anna, Gabrielsen Jon D, Petrick Anthony T

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, 17822, USA,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4081-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3064-7. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute incarceration of paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) requiring urgent or emergent surgery is rare. Patients are often elderly with significant comorbidities and have historically been treated with open abdominal or thoracic incisions. Our study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) in patients with PEH and acute gastric volvulus.

METHODS

We reviewed our prospectively maintained database and identified 269 patients who underwent an initial LPEHR between January 2003 and January 2012. Patients were divided into group A (acute), group B (age- and comorbidity-matched 1:3), and group C (all elective repairs). Group A included those admitted with acute symptoms related to PEH and underwent urgent repair. Patient age, Charlson score, operative time, length of stay (LOS), morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates were compared.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent urgent LPEHR had a higher perioperative morbidity rate than the elective and matched groups. The overall mortality rate was low and no statistical difference was found between groups A, B, and C. LOS in group A was longer than groups B and C. The need for ICU admission was also higher in group A. There was no statistical difference in recurrence rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Historically, patients presenting with acute symptoms related to PEH have required open repair, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The acute group was older and sicker than our elective LPEHR patients and had more adverse events resulting in a longer LOS, even when compared with comorbidity-matched elective patients. However, the LOS remained shorter than that reported for open repair and there was no mortality. The recurrence rates in all groups were low and comparable to elective repairs.

摘要

背景

需要紧急或急诊手术的食管旁疝(PEH)急性嵌顿很少见。患者通常为老年人,合并症较多,历来采用腹部或胸部开放切口进行治疗。我们的研究旨在评估腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术(LPEHR)治疗PEH合并急性胃扭转患者的可行性、安全性和有效性。

方法

我们回顾了前瞻性维护的数据库,确定了2003年1月至2012年1月期间接受初次LPEHR的269例患者。患者分为A组(急性组)、B组(年龄和合并症匹配,比例为1:3)和C组(所有择期修补术)。A组包括因PEH出现急性症状入院并接受紧急修补术的患者。比较患者年龄、查尔森评分、手术时间、住院时间(LOS)、发病率、死亡率和复发率。

结果

接受紧急LPEHR的患者围手术期发病率高于择期组和匹配组。总体死亡率较低,A、B、C组之间未发现统计学差异。A组的LOS长于B组和C组。A组入住ICU的需求也更高。复发率无统计学差异。

结论

历来,出现与PEH相关急性症状的患者需要开放修补术,这与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。急性组比我们的择期LPEHR患者年龄更大、病情更重,不良事件更多,导致LOS更长,即使与合并症匹配的择期患者相比也是如此。然而,LOS仍短于开放修补术报告的时间,且无死亡病例。所有组的复发率都很低,与择期修补术相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验