Suppr超能文献

意义中心团体心理治疗对癌症幸存者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

van der Spek N, Vos J, van Uden-Kraan C F, Breitbart W, Cuijpers P, Holtmaat K, Witte B I, Tollenaar R A E M, Verdonck-de Leeuw I M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology,VU University,Amsterdam,the Netherlands.

Department of Psychology,University of Roehampton,London,UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2017 Aug;47(11):1990-2001. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000447. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors (MCGP-CS) to improve personal meaning, compared with supportive group psychotherapy (SGP) and care as usual (CAU).

METHOD

A total of 170 cancer survivors were randomly assigned to one of the three study arms: MCGP-CS (n = 57); SGP (n = 56); CAU (n = 57). The primary outcome measure was the Personal Meaning Profile (PMP; total score). Secondary outcome measures were subscales of the PMP, psychological well-being (Scales of Psychological Well-being; SPWB), post-traumatic growth (Posttraumatic Growth Inventory), Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC), optimism (Life Orientation Test-Revised), hopelessness (Beck's Hopelessness Scale), psychological distress (anxiety and depression, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS) and quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire; EORTC QLQ-C30). Outcome measures were assessed before randomization, post-intervention, and after 3 and 6 months of follow-up (FU).

RESULTS

Linear mixed model analyses (intention-to-treat) showed significant differences between MCGP-CS, SGP and CAU on the total PMP score, and on (sub)scales of the PMP, SPWB, MAC and HADS. Post-hoc analyses showed significantly stronger treatment effects of MCGP-CS compared with CAU on personal meaning (d = 0.81), goal-orientedness (d = 1.07), positive relations (d = 0.59), purpose in life (d = 0.69); fighting spirit (d = 0.61) (post-intervention) and helpless/hopeless (d = -0.87) (3 months FU); and distress (d = -0.6) and depression (d = -0.38) (6 months FU). Significantly stronger effects of MCGP-CS compared with SGP were found on personal growth (d = 0.57) (3 months FU) and environmental mastery (d = 0.66) (6 months FU).

CONCLUSIONS

MCGP-CS is an effective intervention for cancer survivors to improve personal meaning, psychological well-being and mental adjustment to cancer in the short term, and to reduce psychological distress in the long run.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估以意义为中心的癌症幸存者团体心理治疗(MCGP-CS)相较于支持性团体心理治疗(SGP)和常规护理(CAU)在提升个人意义方面的疗效。

方法

总共170名癌症幸存者被随机分配至三个研究组之一:MCGP-CS组(n = 57);SGP组(n = 56);CAU组(n = 57)。主要结局指标为个人意义量表(PMP;总分)。次要结局指标包括PMP的分量表、心理健康(心理健康量表;SPWB)、创伤后成长(创伤后成长量表)、癌症心理适应(MAC)、乐观主义(生活取向测试修订版)、绝望感(贝克绝望量表)、心理困扰(焦虑和抑郁,医院焦虑抑郁量表;HADS)以及生活质量(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷;EORTC QLQ-C30)。结局指标在随机分组前、干预后以及随访3个月和6个月后进行评估。

结果

线性混合模型分析(意向性分析)显示,MCGP-CS组、SGP组和CAU组在PMP总分以及PMP的(子)量表、SPWB、MAC和HADS方面存在显著差异。事后分析显示,与CAU组相比,MCGP-CS组在个人意义(d = 0.81)、目标导向性(d = 1.07)、积极关系(d = 0.59)、生活目的(d = 0.69)、斗志(d = 0.61)(干预后)以及无助/绝望感(d = -0.87)(随访3个月);心理困扰(d = -0.6)和抑郁(d = -0.38)(随访6个月)方面的治疗效果显著更强。与SGP组相比,MCGP-CS组在个人成长(d = 0.57)(随访3个月)和环境掌控(d = 0.66)(随访6个月)方面的效果显著更强。

结论

MCGP-CS是一种有效的干预措施,可使癌症幸存者在短期内提升个人意义、心理健康以及对癌症的心理适应能力,并在长期内减轻心理困扰。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.癌症治疗和生存统计,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
6
Meaning making in cancer survivors: a focus group study.癌症幸存者的意义建构:一项焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 26;8(9):e76089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076089. eCollection 2013.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验