School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Departments of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Br J Surg. 2017 Jul;104(8):1028-1036. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10526. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
Deficiencies in non-technical skills (NTS) have been increasingly implicated in avoidable operating theatre errors. Accordingly, this study sought to characterize the impact of surgeon and anaesthetist non-technical skills on time to crisis resolution in a simulated operating theatre.
Non-technical skills were assessed during 26 simulated crises (haemorrhage and airway emergency) performed by surgical teams. Teams consisted of surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses. Behaviour was assessed by four trained raters using the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) and Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) rating scales before and during the crisis phase of each scenario. The primary endpoint was time to crisis resolution; secondary endpoints included NTS scores before and during the crisis. A cross-classified linear mixed-effects model was used for the final analysis.
Thirteen different surgical teams were assessed. Higher NTS ratings resulted in significantly faster crisis resolution. For anaesthetists, every 1-point increase in ANTS score was associated with a decrease of 53·50 (95 per cent c.i. 31·13 to 75·87) s in time to crisis resolution (P < 0·001). Similarly, for surgeons, every 1-point increase in NOTSS score was associated with a decrease of 64·81 (26·01 to 103·60) s in time to crisis resolution in the haemorrhage scenario (P = 0·001); however, this did not apply to the difficult airway scenario. Non-technical skills scores were lower during the crisis phase of the scenarios than those measured before the crisis for both surgeons and anaesthetists.
A higher level of NTS of surgeons and anaesthetists led to quicker crisis resolution in a simulated operating theatre environment.
非技术技能(NTS)的不足与可避免的手术室错误密切相关。因此,本研究旨在探讨外科医生和麻醉师的非技术技能对模拟手术室危机解决时间的影响。
在由外科医生、麻醉师和护士组成的 26 个模拟危机(出血和气道紧急情况)中评估非技术技能。使用非技术技能评估外科医生(NOTSS)和麻醉师非技术技能(ANTS)评分量表在每个场景的危机阶段之前和期间评估行为。主要终点是危机解决时间;次要终点包括危机前和期间的 NTS 评分。使用交叉分类线性混合效应模型进行最终分析。
评估了 13 个不同的外科团队。更高的 NTS 评分导致危机更快解决。对于麻醉师,每增加 1 分 ANTS 评分与危机解决时间缩短 53.50(95%可信区间 31.13 至 75.87)秒相关(P<0.001)。同样,对于外科医生,在出血情况下,每增加 1 分 NOTSS 评分与危机解决时间缩短 64.81(26.01 至 103.60)秒相关(P=0.001);然而,这不适用于困难气道情况。在手术场景和麻醉场景的危机阶段,非技术技能评分均低于危机前测量的评分。
外科医生和麻醉师的 NTS 水平越高,在模拟手术室环境中危机解决速度越快。