Janssens Sarah, Simon Robert, Barwick Stephanie, Beckmann Michael, Marshall Stuart
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Apr 20;6(3):135-139. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000409. eCollection 2020.
Shared leadership is associated with improved team performance in many domains, but little is understood about how leadership is shared spontaneously in maternity emergency teams, and if it is associated with improved team performance.
A video analysis study of multidisciplinary teams attending a maternity emergency management course was performed at a simulation centre colocated with a tertiary maternity hospital. Sixteen teams responding to a simulated postpartum haemorrhage were analysed between November 2016 and November 2017. Videos were transcribed, and utterances coded for leadership type using a coding system developed . Distribution of leadership utterances between team members was calculated using the Gini coefficient. Teamwork was assessed using validated tools and clinical performance was assessed by time to perform a critical intervention and a checklist of required tasks.
There was a significant sharing of leadership functions across the team despite the traditional recommendation for a singular leader, with the dominant leader only accounting for 58% of leadership utterances. There was no significant difference in Auckland Team Assessment Tool scores between high and low leadership sharing teams (5.02 vs 4.96, p=0.574). Time to critical intervention was shorter in low leadership sharing teams (193 s vs 312 s, p=0.018) but checklist completion did not differ significantly. Teams with better clinical performance had fewer leadership utterances beyond the dominant two leaders compared with poorer performing teams.
Leadership is spontaneously shared in maternity emergency teams despite the recommendation for singular leadership. Spontaneous leadership emerging from multiple team members does not appear to be associated with the improvements in team performance seen in other domains.
共享领导在许多领域都与团队绩效的提高相关,但对于产科应急团队中领导权如何自发共享,以及它是否与团队绩效的提高相关,人们了解甚少。
在一家三级妇产医院同址的模拟中心,对参加产科应急管理课程的多学科团队进行了视频分析研究。2016年11月至2017年11月期间,对16个应对模拟产后出血的团队进行了分析。对视频进行了转录,并使用开发的编码系统对领导类型的话语进行编码。使用基尼系数计算团队成员之间领导话语的分布。使用经过验证的工具评估团队合作,并通过关键干预的执行时间和所需任务清单评估临床绩效。
尽管传统上建议由单一领导者负责,但团队中领导职能仍有显著的共享,主导领导者的领导话语仅占58%。高领导共享团队和低领导共享团队在奥克兰团队评估工具得分上没有显著差异(5.02对4.96,p = 0.574)。低领导共享团队的关键干预时间更短(193秒对312秒,p = 0.018),但清单完成情况没有显著差异。与表现较差的团队相比,临床绩效较好的团队在主导的两位领导者之外的领导话语较少。
尽管建议由单一领导者负责,但产科应急团队中领导权是自发共享的。多个团队成员产生的自发领导似乎与其他领域中团队绩效的提高无关。