Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Göttingen; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern; Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Mar 10;114(10):161-167. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0161.
Many patients in German hospitals complain of inadequate treatment of their postoperative pain. Hospital-related structural and procedural variables may affect pain perception and patient satisfaction. We studied the association of individual variables with outcome quality.
Data from the years 2011 to 2014 from the world's largest acute pain registry (QUIPS) were evaluated. The analysis was performed with mixed linear regression models.
We studied registry data from 138 German hospitals concerning four commonly performed types of operations (total number of operations, 21 114) and found that the intensity of pain, functional impairment, and satisfaction with postoperative pain therapy were all highly variable from one hospital to another. Patients in university hospitals complained more often than those in standard care facilities of highly intense pain (odds ratio [OR] 2.44; 95% con - fidence interval [CI] [1.18; 5.04]) and dissatisfaction (OR 3.58 [1.85; 6.93]). In specialized centers as well, pain intensity (OR 1.39 [1.06; 1.83]) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.59 [1.25; 2.02]) were higher. Pain-related limitation of movement was also reported more commonly in university hospitals (OR 2.12 [0.87; 5.16]) and specialized centers (OR 1.87 [1.33; 2.65]) than in standard care facilities. Less pain-related limitation of movement and higher satisfaction were reported in hospitals in which pain was documented in the patients' charts and the patients felt adequately informed about the treatment options.
The current state of postoperative pain therapy leaves much room for improvement. Quality indicators in the field of acute pain medicine might help improve patient care.
许多德国医院的患者抱怨术后疼痛治疗不充分。医院相关的结构和程序变量可能会影响疼痛感知和患者满意度。我们研究了个体变量与结果质量的相关性。
评估了来自世界上最大的急性疼痛登记处(QUIPS)的 2011 年至 2014 年的数据。分析采用混合线性回归模型进行。
我们研究了来自 138 家德国医院的登记处数据,涉及四种常见的手术类型(总手术次数为 21114 例),发现疼痛强度、功能障碍和对术后疼痛治疗的满意度在医院之间差异很大。与标准护理机构相比,大学医院的患者更常抱怨疼痛强度高(比值比[OR]2.44;95%置信区间[CI] [1.18;5.04])和不满意(OR 3.58 [1.85;6.93])。在专门中心,疼痛强度(OR 1.39 [1.06;1.83])和不满意(OR 1.59 [1.25;2.02])也更高。与标准护理机构相比,大学医院(OR 2.12 [0.87;5.16])和专门中心(OR 1.87 [1.33;2.65])更常报告与疼痛相关的运动受限。在记录患者图表中疼痛情况且患者感到对治疗方案有足够了解的医院中,疼痛相关的运动受限较少,患者满意度较高。
目前的术后疼痛治疗状况仍有很大的改进空间。急性疼痛医学领域的质量指标可能有助于改善患者护理。