Department of General Surgery, Maria Middelares, Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care, Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Aug;404(5):557-564. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01797-8. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
Since the implementation of total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer surgery, oncological outcomes improved dramatically. With the technique of complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL), the same surgical principles were introduced to the field of colon cancer surgery. Until now, current literature fails to invariably demonstrate its oncological superiority when compared to conventional surgery, and there are some concerns on increased morbidity. The aim of this study is to compare short-term outcomes after left-sided laparoscopic CME versus conventional surgery.
In this retrospective analysis, data on all laparoscopic sigmoidal resections performed during a 3-year period (October 2015 to October 2018) at our institution were collected. A comparative analysis between the CME group-for sigmoid colon cancer-and the non-CME group-for benign disease-was performed.
One hundred sixty-three patients met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Data on 66 CME resections were compared with 97 controls. Median age and operative risk were higher in the CME group. One leak was observed in the CME group (1/66) and 3 in the non-CME group (3/97), representing no significant difference. Regarding hospital stay, postoperative complications, surgical site infections, and intra-abdominal collections, no differences were observed. There was a slightly lower reoperation (1.5% versus 6.2%, p = 0.243) and readmission rate (4.5% versus 6.2%, p = 0.740) in the CME group during the first 30 postoperative days. Operation times were significantly longer in the CME group (210 versus 184 min, p < 0.001), and a trend towards longer pathological specimens in the CME group was noted (21 vs 19 cm, p = 0.059).
CME does not increase short-term complications in laparoscopic left-sided colectomies. Significantly longer operation times were observed in the CME group.
自直肠癌手术中实施全直肠系膜切除术(TME)以来,肿瘤学结果显著改善。随着完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)联合中央血管结扎术(CVL)技术的应用,同样的手术原则也被引入结肠癌手术领域。直到现在,与传统手术相比,目前的文献并不能始终证明其具有肿瘤学优势,而且人们对发病率增加存在一些担忧。本研究旨在比较左侧腹腔镜 CME 与传统手术治疗左侧结肠癌的短期结果。
在这项回顾性分析中,收集了我院在 3 年期间(2015 年 10 月至 2018 年 10 月)进行的所有腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的数据。对 CME 组(乙状结肠癌)和非 CME 组(良性疾病)进行了比较分析。
符合纳入标准的 163 例患者被纳入分析。对 66 例 CME 切除手术的数据与 97 例对照进行了比较。CME 组的中位年龄和手术风险较高。CME 组有 1 例(1/66)漏诊,非 CME 组有 3 例(3/97),无显著差异。在住院时间、术后并发症、手术部位感染和腹腔内积液方面,两组间无差异。CME 组在术后 30 天内的再次手术(1.5%比 6.2%,p=0.243)和再入院率(4.5%比 6.2%,p=0.740)略低。CME 组的手术时间明显较长(210 分钟比 184 分钟,p<0.001),CME 组的病理标本长度也有较长的趋势(21 厘米比 19 厘米,p=0.059)。
在腹腔镜左半结肠切除术,CME 不会增加短期并发症。CME 组的手术时间明显延长。