Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Turku, Finland.
Indoor Environment, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.
Indoor Air. 2017 Nov;27(6):1141-1153. doi: 10.1111/ina.12387. Epub 2017 May 2.
The aim of this laboratory experiment was to study the effects of ventilation rate, and related changes in air quality, predominantly bioeffluents, on work performance, perceived indoor air quality, and health symptoms in a typical conditions of modern open-plan office with low material and equipment emissions. In Condition A, outdoor air flow rate of 28.2 l/s person (CO level 540 ppm) was applied and in Condition B, outdoor air flow rate was 2.3 l/s person (CO level 2260 ppm). CO concentration level was used as an indicator of bioeffluents. Performance was measured with seven different tasks which measure different cognitive processes. Thirty-six subjects participated in the experiment. The exposure time was 4 hours. Condition B had a weak negative effect on performance only in the information retrieval tasks. Condition B increased slightly subjective workload and perceived fatigue. No effects on health symptoms were found. The intensity of symptoms was low in both conditions. The experimental condition had an effect on perceived air quality and observed odor intensity only in the beginning of the session. Although the room temperature was controlled in both conditions, the heat was perceived to impair the performance more in Condition B.
本实验室实验旨在研究通风率的影响,以及与空气质量变化相关的主要生物排放物对工作绩效、感知室内空气质量和健康症状的影响,实验环境为典型的现代开放式办公空间,其材料和设备排放量较低。在条件 A 中,每人的室外空气流量为 28.2 l/s(CO 浓度为 540 ppm),而在条件 B 中,每人的室外空气流量为 2.3 l/s(CO 浓度为 2260 ppm)。CO 浓度水平用作生物排放物的指标。使用七种不同的任务来衡量不同的认知过程来测量性能。36 名受试者参加了实验。暴露时间为 4 小时。仅在信息检索任务中,条件 B 对性能产生了微弱的负面影响。条件 B 略微增加了主观工作负荷和感知疲劳。未发现健康症状有任何影响。在两种情况下,症状的强度都较低。实验条件仅在会议开始时对感知空气质量和观察到的气味强度产生影响。尽管两种条件都控制了室温,但在条件 B 中,热被认为会对性能产生更大的影响。