Department of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia.
Department of Chemistry, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola P.M.B 2076, Adamawa State, Nigeria.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 13;16(8):1334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081334.
The chemicals from laboratories pose a significant risk forinducing erythema, an abnormal redness of the skin, as a result of poor occupational and environmental factors that promote hypersensitivity to a chemical agent. The aim of this present study was to determine the occupational and environmental risk factors influencing the inducement of erythema in laboratory workers due to exposure to chemicals. This was a cross-sectional study on a population-based sample of Nigerian university laboratory workers. Data were collected using the erythema index meter and an indoor air control meter. The study included 287 laboratory workers. The laboratory workers who properly used personal protective equipment (PPE) were 60% less likely to have induced erythema (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.40; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.22-0.77; probability value = 0.011). The chemical mixture exceeding the permissible exposure limit (PEL) was found to have a small effect in inducing the erythema (AOR = 4.22; 95%CI: 2.88-12.11; = 0.004). Most of the sampled laboratories where the respondents worked had unsuitable temperatures (AOR = 8.21; 95% CI: 4.03-15.01; = 0.001). Erythema was more frequently found in the respondents who spent 4-5h in the laboratory (AOR = 3.11; 95%CI: 1.77-9.23; = 0.001). However, high levels of ventilation reduce the likelihood of erythema in a laboratory by 82% (0.18). Multiple logistic regressions revealed that PPE, PEL, exposure time, temperature, and ventilation were the probable predictive factors associated with the inducement of erythema. Providing better educational knowledge and improving the attitude towards hazards and safety in a laboratory would lead to reduced rates of new cases.
实验室中的化学物质由于职业和环境因素不良,导致对化学物质产生过敏反应,从而对皮肤造成红斑等显著风险。本研究旨在确定影响实验室工作人员因接触化学物质而导致红斑的职业和环境风险因素。这是一项基于尼日利亚大学实验室工作人员的横断面研究。数据使用红斑指数计和室内空气控制计收集。研究共纳入 287 名实验室工作人员。正确使用个人防护设备 (PPE) 的实验室工作人员发生红斑的可能性降低 60%(调整后的优势比 (AOR) = 0.40;95%置信区间 CI:0.22-0.77;概率值 = 0.011)。发现化学混合物超过允许暴露限值 (PEL) 会轻微诱发红斑(AOR = 4.22;95%CI:2.88-12.11; = 0.004)。受访者工作的大多数采样实验室的温度都不合适(AOR = 8.21;95%CI:4.03-15.01; = 0.001)。在实验室中工作 4-5 小时的受访者中,红斑更为常见(AOR = 3.11;95%CI:1.77-9.23; = 0.001)。然而,高通风水平可使实验室发生红斑的可能性降低 82%(0.18)。多因素逻辑回归显示,PPE、PEL、暴露时间、温度和通风是与红斑诱发相关的可能预测因素。提供更好的职业知识教育并改善对实验室危害和安全的态度,将降低新发病例的发生率。