Suppr超能文献

“七月效应”:教学医院七月医疗收治情况剖析

The "July Effect": A Look at July Medical Admissions in Teaching Hospitals.

作者信息

Mims Lisa D, Porter Maribeth, Simpson Kit N, Carek Peter J

机构信息

From the Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (LDM); the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville (MP, PJC); and the Department of Healthcare Leadership and Management, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (KNS).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):189-195. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160214.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We examined the effect of admission for myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia during the first academic quarter compared with all other quarters in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals on length of stay, cost, and mortality.

METHODS

Using data 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, multivariable modeling with an interaction term was used to test teaching hospital effect by academic quarter. Logistic regression was used for mortality and log-transformed linear models for cost and length of stay.

RESULTS

Charlson Index scores were similar in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Patients admitted to teaching hospitals for myocardial infarction in the first quarter had a higher risk-adjusted mortality (1.217; confidence interval, 1.147-1.290) than those admitted to a nonteaching hospital during the same quarter (0.849; confidence interval, 0.815-0.885). Mean cost heart failure admissions averaged $584 more, and the mean length of stay was longer (0.10; = .0127), during the first academic quarter. These effects were not present for quarters 2 through 4.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests small increases in mortality among patients admitted with myocardial infarction in the first academic quarter compared with all other quarters in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. Increased cost and longer stay were seen for those admitted with heart failure.

摘要

目的

我们比较了教学医院与非教学医院在第一学年季度与其他所有季度收治心肌梗死、心力衰竭或肺炎患者对住院时间、费用和死亡率的影响。

方法

利用2011年全国住院患者样本,采用带有交互项的多变量模型来检验按学年季度划分的教学医院效应。采用逻辑回归分析死亡率,对费用和住院时间采用对数转换线性模型。

结果

教学医院和非教学医院的查尔森指数评分相似。第一季度在教学医院因心肌梗死入院的患者,其风险调整后的死亡率(1.217;置信区间为1.147 - 1.290)高于同一季度在非教学医院入院的患者(0.849;置信区间为0.815 - 0.885)。在第一学年季度,心力衰竭入院患者的平均费用多584美元,平均住院时间更长(0.10;P = 0.0127)。第二至第四季度不存在这些影响。

结论

本研究表明,与教学医院和非教学医院的其他所有季度相比,第一学年季度因心肌梗死入院患者的死亡率略有增加。心力衰竭患者的费用增加且住院时间延长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验