• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知障碍者电子监测中的伦理考量

Ethical Considerations in Electronic Monitoring of the Cognitively Impaired.

作者信息

Yang Y Tony, Kels Charles G

机构信息

From the Department of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA (YTY); the Division of Legislative Counsel, American Medical Association, Washington, DC (CGK); and the Judge Advocate General's Corps, US Air Force Reserve, Washington (CGK).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):258-263. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160219.

DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160219
PMID:28379834
Abstract

Cognitive impairment afflicts an estimated 16 million people in the United States. Wandering is a concerning behavior associated with cognitive impairment, as it may threaten patient safety. The risks posed by wandering place severe burdens on both professional and informal caregivers, as well as law enforcement institutions throughout the United States. As such, location trackers that could reduce this burden have become increasingly prevalent. As with many assistive technologies, the substantial promise of location trackers is counterbalanced by potential pitfalls with respect to loss of privacy and autonomy. This article reviews the ethical issues raised by electronic monitoring of cognitively impaired persons, with the goal of transcending a narrow focus on decisional capacity in favor of a patient-centered framework that is applicable and adjustable at different stages of cognitive decline. Balancing the ethical principles of beneficence and respect in treating cognitively impaired persons goes beyond the necessary step of evaluating decision-making capacity to include partnering with families, caretakers, and cognitively impaired individuals who wander in a collaborative coalition of care. An approach emphasizing the individual needs of patients and caretakers is best suited to finding solutions that implement tracking technologies in ways that both protect and empower the cognitively impaired.

摘要

据估计,美国有1600万人患有认知障碍。徘徊是一种与认知障碍相关的令人担忧的行为,因为它可能威胁患者安全。徘徊带来的风险给美国各地的专业和非专业护理人员以及执法机构都带来了沉重负担。因此,能够减轻这种负担的定位追踪器越来越普遍。与许多辅助技术一样,定位追踪器的巨大前景被隐私和自主权丧失方面的潜在问题所抵消。本文回顾了对认知障碍者进行电子监测所引发的伦理问题,目的是超越对决策能力的狭隘关注,转而采用以患者为中心的框架,该框架在认知衰退的不同阶段都适用且可调整。在治疗认知障碍者时平衡行善和尊重的伦理原则,不仅需要评估决策能力这一必要步骤,还包括与家庭、护理人员以及徘徊的认知障碍个体合作,形成一个协作的护理联盟。强调患者和护理人员个体需求的方法最适合找到以既能保护又能增强认知障碍者能力的方式应用追踪技术的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Ethical Considerations in Electronic Monitoring of the Cognitively Impaired.认知障碍者电子监测中的伦理考量
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):258-263. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160219.
2
Does the Shoe Fit? Ethical, Legal, and Policy Considerations of Global Positioning System Shoes for Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease.这双鞋合适吗?针对阿尔茨海默病患者的全球定位系统鞋的伦理、法律和政策考量
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1708-15. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14265. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
3
Families' and professional caregivers' views of using advanced technology to track people with dementia.家庭和专业护理人员对使用先进技术追踪痴呆症患者的看法。
Qual Health Res. 2010 Mar;20(3):409-19. doi: 10.1177/1049732309359171.
4
What do cognitively intact older people think about the use of electronic tracking devices for people with dementia? A preliminary analysis.认知功能正常的老年人如何看待使用电子追踪设备来照顾痴呆症患者?初步分析。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Dec;22(8):1301-9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610210001316. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
5
Ethical issues in providing care to the cognitively impaired patient.
J Adv Med Surg Nurs. 1989 Mar;1(2):40-7.
6
Did I Tell You That? Ethical Issues Related to Using Computational Methods to Discover Non-Disclosed Patient Characteristics.我告诉过你那件事吗?与使用计算方法发现未公开的患者特征相关的伦理问题。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Jul;11(3):214-9. doi: 10.1177/1556264616661611.
7
Informed consent and the elderly. An ethical challenge for critical care nursing.知情同意与老年人。重症护理面临的伦理挑战。
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1990 Sep;2(3):461-71.
8
Self-Neglect: Ethical Considerations.自我忽视:伦理考量。
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2016;34:89-107. doi: 10.1891/0739-6686.34.89.
9
Ethical perspectives on emerging assistive technologies: insights from focus groups with stakeholders in long-term care facilities.新兴辅助技术的伦理视角:来自长期护理机构利益相关者焦点小组的见解
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Mar;4(1):25-36. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.1.25.
10
Ethical Questions in Medical Electronic Adherence Monitoring.医学电子依从性监测中的伦理问题
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Mar;31(3):338-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3502-4. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic Tracking Devices for People With Dementia: Content Analysis of Company Websites.用于痴呆症患者的电子追踪设备:公司网站内容分析
JMIR Aging. 2022 Nov 11;5(4):e38865. doi: 10.2196/38865.
2
Approach to Management of Wandering in Dementia: Ethical and Legal Issue.痴呆症患者游走行为的管理方法:伦理与法律问题
Indian J Psychol Med. 2021 Sep;43(5 Suppl):S53-S59. doi: 10.1177/02537176211030979. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
3
Sensing Technology to Monitor Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms and to Assess Treatment Response in People With Dementia. A Systematic Review.
用于监测痴呆症患者行为和心理症状及评估治疗反应的传感技术。一项系统综述。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Feb 4;10:1699. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01699. eCollection 2019.
4
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Smart Health Technologies for People With Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review and Design Framework.影响痴呆症患者及其非正式护理人员采用智能健康技术的因素:范围综述与设计框架
JMIR Aging. 2019 Apr 30;2(1):e12192. doi: 10.2196/12192.
5
Ethical considerations in the use of GPS-based movement tracking in health research - lessons from a care-seeking study in rural west India.健康研究中基于全球定位系统的运动追踪使用中的伦理考量——来自印度西部农村一项就医研究的经验教训
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010323. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010323.