Agrawal Ritwick, Wang Julie A, Ko Anita G, Getsy Joanne E
Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0174458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174458. eCollection 2017.
The apnea hypopnea index (AHI) reported by positive airway pressure (PAP) device is widely used in clinical practice, yet its correlation with standardized AHI obtained during the sleep study is not established. The current study was conducted to investigate the correlation between AHI estimated by the PAP device and reported on the smart card with the AHI found during the PAP polysomnography (PSG) in the "real world" setting at an academic sleep center. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 280 patients who underwent a PAP titration PSG at Drexel sleep center, and were later prescribed a PAP device. The AHI was categorized in clinically relevant subgroups (as AHI ≤5 and AHI >5). The AHI at the final pressure on the PSG and the average AHI from the prescribed PAP device were compared. The results showed that in the majority (77.3%) of patients (126 of 163), the AHI from both PAP device and PSG correlated well and were in the same category (AHI ≤5 and AHI >5 respectively). The majority of patients (80.7%) with PSG AHI of <5 had PAP device AHI <5 as well. By contrast, if PSG AHI was >5, 61.5% patients reported good control, with AHI <5 on PAP device AHI. We conclude that in a majority of patients who were optimally titrated in the sleep laboratory, the PAP device continued to show optimal control at home.
气道正压通气(PAP)设备报告的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)在临床实践中被广泛应用,但其与睡眠研究期间获得的标准化AHI之间的相关性尚未确立。本研究旨在调查在学术睡眠中心的“真实世界”环境中,PAP设备估计并记录在智能卡上的AHI与PAP多导睡眠图(PSG)期间发现的AHI之间的相关性。我们回顾性分析了280例在德雷塞尔睡眠中心接受PAP滴定PSG检查、随后被开具PAP设备的患者的病历。将AHI分为临床相关亚组(AHI≤5和AHI>5)。比较了PSG最终压力下的AHI与所开具PAP设备的平均AHI。结果显示,大多数患者(77.3%,163例中的126例)的PAP设备AHI和PSG AHI相关性良好,且属于同一类别(分别为AHI≤5和AHI>5)。大多数PSG AHI<5的患者(80.7%)的PAP设备AHI也<5。相比之下,如果PSG AHI>5,61.5%的患者报告控制良好,PAP设备AHI<5。我们得出结论,在大多数在睡眠实验室中进行了最佳滴定的患者中,PAP设备在家中仍能持续显示出最佳控制效果。