Anderson Julie D, Wagovich Stacy A
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Missouri, Columbia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):836-852. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0135.
The purpose of this study was to examine (a) explicit and implicit verbal response inhibition in preschool children who do stutter (CWS) and do not stutter (CWNS) and (b) the relationship between response inhibition and language skills.
Participants were 41 CWS and 41 CWNS between the ages of 3;1 and 6;1 (years;months). Explicit verbal response inhibition was measured using a computerized version of the grass-snow task (Carlson & Moses, 2001), and implicit verbal response inhibition was measured using the baa-meow task. Main dependent variables were reaction time and accuracy.
The CWS were significantly less accurate than the CWNS on the implicit task, but not the explicit task. The CWS also exhibited slower reaction times than the CWNS on both tasks. Between-group differences in performance could not be attributed to working memory demands. Overall, children's performance on the inhibition tasks corresponded with parents' perceptions of their children's inhibition skills in daily life.
CWS are less effective and efficient than CWNS in suppressing a dominant response while executing a conflicting response in the verbal domain.
本研究旨在考察(a)口吃儿童(CWS)和非口吃儿童(CWNS)的显性和隐性言语反应抑制,以及(b)反应抑制与语言技能之间的关系。
研究对象为41名年龄在3岁1个月至6岁1个月之间的CWS儿童和41名CWNS儿童。显性言语反应抑制通过计算机化的草-雪任务(Carlson & Moses,2001)进行测量,隐性言语反应抑制通过咩-喵任务进行测量。主要因变量为反应时间和准确性。
在隐性任务中,CWS儿童的准确性显著低于CWNS儿童,但在显性任务中并非如此。在两项任务中,CWS儿童的反应时间也比CWNS儿童慢。组间表现差异不能归因于工作记忆需求。总体而言,儿童在抑制任务上的表现与父母对其在日常生活中抑制技能的认知相符。
在言语领域执行冲突反应时,CWS儿童在抑制优势反应方面比CWNS儿童效率更低、效果更差。